MAY INCLUDE SPOILERS!!!
I know that Running with Scissors has been made into a movie and
the novel received some kind of critical acclaim, but I really
didn't get it.
The family in the story lives in squalor, children are abused,
people are eating dog food and running around naked. I just don't
understand why people liked the book. I also don't understand how
writers feel the need to purge themselves of the past by writing
stories such as this one, then getting it published. Really, not
everything needs to be read by your public. Running With Scissors
is dark and disturbing-not quirky, fun, or uplifting. Not. At. All.
I find it interesting that there's now an apology in the Product
Description over at Amazon that says, "I would like to thank the
real-life members of the family portrayed in this book for taking
me into their home and accepting me as one of their own. I
recognize that their memories of the events described in this book
are different than my own. They are each fine, decent, and
hard-working people. The book was not intended to hurt the family.
Both my publisher and I regret any unintentional harm resulting
from the publishing and marketing of Running with Scissors." The
memoir was then deemed as a "book" rather than a "memoir."
I guess that's the problem with memoirs-how much can you really
remember, unless you're depending solely on journals kept
throughout the years. I remember that Oprah had James Frey on her
show and was raving about his book A Million Little Pieces. I
picked up the book after the hype and read it and thought it was
great-so what if he fabricated some of it?
Is this something that memoir writers are going to have to do from
now on? Have something explaining that there may be differences in
how people remember things? I find so many memoirs, this one
included, to be so detailed that there has so be some fabrication.
If you really want to read a memoir, skip this one. There are way
better books out there.