Ruth is a sex-ed teacher in a small town that is becoming more and
more Christian with every passing day. During class, Ruth says that
some people may enjoy oral sex, and this triggers the school board
to take an abstinence only approach to sex-ed. Ruth is feeling
powerless and frustrated by this, so when she sees her daughter's
soccer coach, Tim, doing a group prayer with the kids, she gets
livid. Tim, a born again Christian and former drug addict, feels
like there is something missing in his life. His encounter with
Ruth leaves him feeling confused by his attraction to her. The
Abstinence Teacher examines how evangelical Christianity influences
the town and its residents.
The premise on which this novel is based evokes some strong
feelings in a lot of people. I liked the slightly controversial
nature to the story, but I felt like the author could have been a
little bolder about it. The novel started off strongly with its
introduction of Ruth because it presented her as a strong woman who
was still aware of her sexual appeal even after her divorce. I
really liked these qualities. The contrasting views that each
character had on the subject of Christianity and what part it
should play in life was presented well, and I thought fairly. There
was good amount of humor added in to keep the story interesting
rather than overly serious.
At the beginning, I felt that Perrotta had a clear vision and a
strong direction regarding the points he wanted to make in the
novel. As the novel progressed though, I felt that he lost his
momentum a bit. The insightful, sometimes comical observations that
Perrotta made were broken up by scenes describing soccer games that
Ruth's daughter played in and Tim coached which I found to get
rather dull. I also became a little frustrated by the character's
inability to clearly see what the problems in their lives were and
react appropriately. I suppose that is realistic because it's hard
to be objective about your own life, but it was irritating none the
less to watch particularly Tim make decisions that in no way would
help his situation.
The ending felt like a compromise to me. It seemed to me that there
was a lot more that Perrotta may have wanted to say through his
characters, but for whatever reason he toned it down to a milder
version. Ruth seemed so strong in her convictions at the start, but
by the end she lost the unyielding strength that I so admired. I
really had hoped for a more potent, aggressive message. The message
I did take away from it was a weak one about not forcing one's
views on others. I'd still recommend reading it, but go into it
without expectations because they probably wouldn't be met anyway.