Well, after two fantastic "hook and chase" novels like the Da Vinci
Code and Angels and Demons (I haven't read his other novels)
expectations were high for the The Lost Symbol. In the third of the
professor Robert Langdon series, our favourite symbologist gets
wrapped into the heart of Masonry lore and the secret location of
the Ancient Mysteries. The city of choice this time is Washington
D.C. Langdon has gone to Washington to help his mentor, Peter
Soloman, who is a high ranking Mason, and gets involved in a plot
to steal the Ancient Mysteries, a secret, higher knowledge and
truth that is only known to the highest of ranking Masons. Langdon
must race against time, deal with a moody CIA agent named Sato (the
most interesting character in the book) and Mr. Soloman's sister,
celebrated scientist Katherine Soloman.
As in typical Brown form, the location of where the book takes
place is equally, if not more, important than the story. As he did
with Rome, London and Paris in his previous aforementioned novels,
Brown intertwines the story with the most prominent monuments in
Washington, weighing rumours and myths along the way.
While the book can still be classified as a "page-turner", as Brown
has a way of adding suspense to every page, the book was a
disappointment. Maybe my expectations were too high, or maybe
masonry folklore and the Ancient Mysteries just didn't stir any
interest in me. I felt the book was flat and often repeated at
nausea the same theories of the Ancient Mysteries. I recall in the
Da Vinci Code, when the "version" of how God was a mortal was
discussed, it was only referred to thereafter, we didn't hear the
story over and over again throughout the book. In this book, it
felt the like the secret meanings, etc. were repeated over and over
again. The last 30 pages of the book was simply a repeat of earlier
dialogue. Maybe Brown expected only stupid people to read this
book, with short memories.
My biggest issue with this book is it seems that Brown made Langdon
far less intelligent than in the two previous writings. While
Langdon's character has always been suspect of ancient rumours and
myths, he never simply ignored them. In this novel, it seems
Langdon is somewhat of a snob, failing to even consider ancient
legends and is not nearly as intelligent in his earlier dealings.
In fact, he was a bit annoying at times.
Overall, the book, while thrilling and entertaining at times, was
disappointing. Of course, maybe I expected too much.