The book became a major disappointment for me. I've read so many
raving reviews about The Other Boleyn Girl, I couldn't wait to read
more about Anne Boleyn and her lesser known sister. I expected a
gem of historical fiction, but got more fiction than I've ever
bargained for and hardly any history at all.
In my opinion the major flaw of this book is that it's told from
Mary Boleyn's point of view, which considerably limits the scope of
events that the author can play with. Mary herself confesses that
she isn't interested in England's politics, internal or
international. Because of that we, as a reader, never experience
the great tension that came from constant political juggling with
Spain or France - a major force that drove the king's passion for
superiority in Europe. We never really get to see how great of a
change the English Reformation was - probably one of the most
important events in the country's history. The key figures that
practically shaped the events of the period and played a major role
in Henry's ruling and marriage decisions, - Thomas More, Cardinal
Wolsey, Bishop Fisher to name a few - are cast aside as episodic
characters. Oops, they died, who cares? Cromwell, who? It is
understandable that the novel is a story about the two Boleyn
sisters, not a history textbook, but all of these mentioned people
and affairs were directly connected to Anne and had a lot to do
with her rise and demise.
Besides the lack of substance in the plot, I also have a lot of
issues with the characters. The two sisters are extremely black and
white. While Mary is all that is innocent and wants nothing but to
live a peaceful life with her husband and children, Anne spends her
days scheming, plotting and poisoning people. Mary is unbelievably
selfless and committed, everything she does is meant for good of
those around her. She doesn't need anything, but to live on a farm
in the country. I am sorry, but I don't believe that a girl, who's
been brought up in a court full of intrigues and luxuries since she
was four, would even dare to think of such things as being a
farmer. I also don't believe that she is so against plotting for
the throne. Girls of that time were used to arranged marriages and
considered any chance that would bring them a beneficial match and
name to their families.
No matter how much I've disliked Anne in the past, I can't help but
feel sorry for her for being portrayed so horribly by Gregory. The
author makes her look just pure evil! It seems that till the very
end Anne is ready to use anyone and everyone to get her out of hot
water or drag them down with her in case she fails. I don't believe
that Anne didn't care for her daughter, on the contrary, in reality
she did everything she could to secure Elizabeth's future and to
protect her from Henry's wrath. I don't think her support of
Reformation was based on selfish desire to improve her stature;
Anne was a deeply religious person, and she wanted to expose Rome's
corruption for the good of English people. And I find the claim
that she committed incest with her brother to be completely
ridiculous. Not a single historian believes in validity of these
claims, and it is widely accepted that the story was made up to rid
Henry of the unwanted marriage. Overall, I think the readers who
have never read any history books on Anne would get a very wrong
picture of this fascinating woman.