The Lochner Court, Myth And Reality: Substantive Due Process From The 1890s To The 1930s

by Michael J. Phillips

Praeger Publishers | November 1, 2000 | Hardcover

Not yet rated | write a review
Conventional wisdom holds that the Lochner Court illegitimately used the Constitution''s due process clauses to strike down Progressive legislation designed to protect the poor and powerless against big business. This book systematically examines all of the U.S. Supreme Court''s substantive due process cases from 1897 through 1937 and finds that they do not support long-held beliefs about the Lochner Court. The Court was more Progressive than commonly imagined, striking down far fewer laws on substantive due process grounds than is generally believed. The laws it overturned were not invariably social legislation, and relatively few due process cases involved freedom of contract. Moreover, Holmes, despite his reputation as a Great Dissenter, joined many of the cases striking down government action. The book attacks three familiar normative criticisms of the Lochner Court. It accerts that (1) the Court''s substantive due process decisions almost certainly were not motivated by a conscious desire to assist business by suppressing social legislation; only sometimes did the justices'' nostalgia for laissez-faire lead to this result; (2) the conservative justices'' understanding of business and government often exceeded that found in the typical "Brandeis Brief"; and (3) most applications of Lochner-era substantive due process cannot readily be described as illegitimate assertions of judicial power lacking justification in the due process clauses.

Format: Hardcover

Dimensions: 224 pages, 9.46 × 6.34 × 0.88 in

Published: November 1, 2000

Publisher: Praeger Publishers

Language: English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10: 0275969304

ISBN - 13: 9780275969301

save
5%

In Stock Not yet released

$164.50  ea

Online Price

$164.50 List Price

or, Used from $99.38

eGift this item

Give this item in the form of an eGift Card.

+ what is this?

This item is eligible for FREE SHIPPING on orders over $25.
See details

Easy, FREE returns. See details

Item can only be shipped in Canada

Downloads instantly to your kobo or other ereading device. See details

All available formats:

Reviews

– More About This Product –

The Lochner Court, Myth And Reality: Substantive Due Process From The 1890s To The 1930s

by Michael J. Phillips

Format: Hardcover

Dimensions: 224 pages, 9.46 × 6.34 × 0.88 in

Published: November 1, 2000

Publisher: Praeger Publishers

Language: English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10: 0275969304

ISBN - 13: 9780275969301

From the Publisher

Conventional wisdom holds that the Lochner Court illegitimately used the Constitution''s due process clauses to strike down Progressive legislation designed to protect the poor and powerless against big business. This book systematically examines all of the U.S. Supreme Court''s substantive due process cases from 1897 through 1937 and finds that they do not support long-held beliefs about the Lochner Court. The Court was more Progressive than commonly imagined, striking down far fewer laws on substantive due process grounds than is generally believed. The laws it overturned were not invariably social legislation, and relatively few due process cases involved freedom of contract. Moreover, Holmes, despite his reputation as a Great Dissenter, joined many of the cases striking down government action. The book attacks three familiar normative criticisms of the Lochner Court. It accerts that (1) the Court''s substantive due process decisions almost certainly were not motivated by a conscious desire to assist business by suppressing social legislation; only sometimes did the justices'' nostalgia for laissez-faire lead to this result; (2) the conservative justices'' understanding of business and government often exceeded that found in the typical "Brandeis Brief"; and (3) most applications of Lochner-era substantive due process cannot readily be described as illegitimate assertions of judicial power lacking justification in the due process clauses.

Editorial Reviews

?...this is an important and interesting book, and one that should be read by anyone with an interest in the Lochner era.??Law and History Review
Item not added

This item is not available to order at this time.

See used copies from 00.00
  • My Gift List
  • My Wish List
  • Shopping Cart