The Weird Sisters by Eleanor BrownThe Weird Sisters by Eleanor Brown

The Weird Sisters

byEleanor Brown

Paperback | February 7, 2012

Pricing and Purchase Info

$18.33 online 
$22.00 list price save 16%
Earn 92 plum® points

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Available in stores


This is the "delightful" (People) New York Times bestseller that's earned raves from Sarah Blake, Helen Simonson, and reviewers everywhere-the story of three sisters who love each other, but just don't happen to like each other very much...

Three sisters have returned to their childhood home, reuniting the eccentric Andreas family. Here, books are a passion (there is no problem a library card can't solve) and TV is something other people watch. Their father-a professor of Shakespeare who speaks almost exclusively in verse-named them after the Bard's heroines. It's a lot to live up to.

The sisters have a hard time communicating with their parents and their lovers, but especially with one another. What can the shy homebody eldest sister, the fast-living middle child, and the bohemian youngest sibling have in common? Only that none has found life to be what was expected; and now, faced with their parents' frailty and their own personal disappointments, not even a book can solve what ails them...

Eleanor Brown's writing has been published in anthologies, magazines, and journals. She holds an M.A. in Literature and works in education in South Florida but will be living in the Denver area, Colorado at pub date.
Title:The Weird SistersFormat:PaperbackDimensions:400 pages, 8.2 × 5.4 × 1 inPublished:February 7, 2012Publisher:Penguin Publishing GroupLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0425244148

ISBN - 13:9780425244142


Rated 2 out of 5 by from Not bad, but utterly forgettable. The Weird Sisters is a weird little book The novel is narrated by a singular collective comprised of all three sisters which I find interesting in theory but strange and awkward in execution. The character development was certainly better, and while each character is rather archetypal of her own personality, their goals, ambitions, and sentiments are ones with which readers can easily identify. These characters aren't particularly brilliant, sophisticated, gifted, or beautiful. They are average. And after roughly three decades of striving for what they are not, they each accept their place in the world (they make efforts toward self-improvement, but now with goals that they can actually attain), and ultimately find satisfaction and happiness in the ordinary. I found them all terribly annoying, though. And selfish. I couldn't identify with or really cheer on any single character. Rose is self-martyred and still resents that she hasn't been an only child in nearly 30 years, Bianca has the whole poor-me-middle-child thing going to an absurd extreme to the point of embezzlement and adultery, and if Cordelia were a man, she'd be referred to in pop culture as a man-child having a child. Their father is more concerned with plays he has read multiple times than his own daughters' feelings, and their mother would get so lost in her own thoughts to such an extent that she'd often forget to buy them food to bring to school for lunch or even forget to feed them dinner. I like the guy who owns the coffee shop and the Reverend. Everyone else is useless.
Date published: 2017-07-21
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Shakespeare and Sisters This book had a bit in common with "We're All in This Together". The book centres around the relationship between and the lives of 3 sisters - Rosalind (Rose), Bianca (Bean) and Cordelia (Cordy). The three girls were named for characters in Shakespeare as their father is a scholar. I liked the characters and enjoyed being embroiled in their world - drama filled as it is. I can relate to many of the issues discussed as all three girls return home to their small hometown to help their mother who is suffering through breast cancer. Many of their problems come from the town to which they were born into. Two of them getting out as soon as possible and one staying and fearing leaving. I loved all the allusions to and quoting from Shakespeare as it makes for a fun quirkiness in this family. At times their 'dramas' were a bit much (Bean and Cordy's stories I felt to be a little over the top) but you kind of expect that in a novel like this. Overall I felt it gave some fun insights into how our home shapes us for better or for worse.
Date published: 2016-09-12
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Get it from the library This book was ok, but not great. The characters are not very sympathetic and significantly lack in maturity. I had to push myself to finish it. If you want to read it, get it from the library but don't spend the money to own it.
Date published: 2012-08-03
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Relatable (not so weird) sisters I love Shakespeare, especially the tragedies. This book however remained light in spite of the weight of the Shakespearean characters the Weird Sisters were named after and the smattering of quotes interspersed (which I loved!). In the end, it is a story of family, sisterhood, and an enjoyable read.
Date published: 2012-07-02
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Courtesy of Lost For Words. Source: Received from publicist. Many thanks goes to Bronwyn from Penguin Canada for sending me a copy of this book for review. I received this book free of charge in exchange for an honest review. My rating: 4/5 The Andreas sisters are all heading back home for one reason or another. The main reason they want you to believe is because their mother is ailing, and they are coming home to care for her. The actual reason for each sister's homecoming is much more secretive. They are all running from a past that has been less than stellar, and are hoping to recharge, while they figure out what to do with their lives. What they don't realize is that every sibling is headed home, so the Andreas household is full again. With a father who speaks in Shakespearian phrases, the whole family must have a healthy relationship with books, and specifically, Shakespeare's works. This coming of age novel is sure to entertain as the sisters realize that this might be the crossroads they are looking for to improve their lives for the better. Rose, Bianca, and Cordy are all exceptional characters and their nuances made each of them shine in their own way. Though I found myself identifying the most with Rose, as we are both the oldest siblings in our respective families, I couldn't help but identify with Bianca and Cordy as well. They are well-rounded characters, flawed, and most of all, human. With their return to the family home, they learn more about the bond a family has, and how they are there for each other, regardless of past grievances. I especially enjoyed the voice of the novel as it wasn't just one sister talking. It seemed like I was the fourth invisible sister which made it seem like I was privy to information that the other sisters weren't aware of at times. The other aspect I enjoyed was the fact that the whole family loved reading. They could pick up a book, read it anywhere, and if one family member set it down for any length of time, they might not get it back before the rest of the family had finished reading it. The Shakespeare quotes were excellent as well, and I found it interesting to see how they communicated with each other in Shakespearian verse. Many of the thoughts and comments throughout the book resound with a familiarity for those with siblings. Most of them could be applicable to life in every family, especially a family of readers. All in all, an exceptional, coming of age debut that chronicles the lives of the Andreas sisters, Rose, Bianca, and Cordy. Many will enjoy the similarities between the siblings and their own respective families, and they will most likely love the comments about reading and family. I'd definitely recommend this to anyone, especially as the book states, "there is no problem that a library card can't solve".
Date published: 2011-03-11
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Blah Long and monotous. There's kinda a plotline but it's vauge and wanders. I didn't really connect to any of the characters. I loved all the Shakespeare references but that's about it.
Date published: 2011-03-10
Rated 5 out of 5 by from A standout debut - I loved it! Eleanor Brown's debut novel The Weird Sisters is an absolute gem. I was hooked from the first few pages. And as I turned the last, I sat quietly and savoured the story in my mind. Cordelia (Cordy), Bianca (Bean) and Rosaline (Rose) Andreas are three sisters all named after Shakespearean characters by their father, who is a Bard scholar. "We wear our names heavily. and though we have tried to escape their influence, they have seeped into us, and we find ourselves living their patterns again and again." An event in each of their lives has each of them heading home again... "We came home because we were failures. We wouldn't admit that, of course, not at first, not to ourselves, and certainly not to anyone else. We said we came home because our mother was ill, because we needed a break, a momentary pause before setting off for the Next Big Thing. But the truth was, we had failed and rather than let anyone else know, we crafted careful excuses and alibis and wrapped them around ourselves like a cloak to keep out the cold truth." Each is surprised and not overly happy to find the others there. "See, we love each other. We just don't happen to like each other very much." What follows is an absolutely mesmerizing story of the complicated relationships between sisters, between parents and children and the search each sister undertakes to find herself and her place in family and life. "Who would Bean be if she dropped her beautiful mask? Who would Cordy be if she stepped up to the plate in her own life? Who would Rose be if she weren't the responsible one anymore?" Brown's characters fairly leap off the page - I could hear their dialogue and picture their actions so clearly. (And maybe hear some of my own sisters' words as they spoke...) Brown has a way with words. Some of her descriptive passages had me reading them twice...."Bean pulled a heavy towel form the stack of laundry, unwinding it from the lascivious position it had gotten into with a pillowcase." The Andreas family are lovers of the written word. They often connect (and dad most often) by quoting Shakespeare passages. "Our family has always communicated its deepest feelings through the words of a man who has been dead for almost four hundred years." Their home overflows with books, often laying about half finished, picked up and read by the next person to pass by. And there's nothing that can't be solved by having a library card. (!) The Weird Sisters is written in first person plural style. This took me a bit to get used to and I found myself trying to determine who was narrating for the first little bit. But it seemed to work - it seems as each sister is contributing to the narrative, instead of just one of them. This one was a five star read for me - one to recommend to the women in your life - sisters, mothers, daughters and friends. (Books clubs would love this one too)
Date published: 2011-02-14

Bookclub Guide

INTRODUCTIONThere is no problem that a library card can't solve.The Andreas family is one of readers. Their father, a re¬nowned Shakespeare professor who speaks almost entirely in verse, has named his three daughters after famous Shakespearean women. When the sisters return to their childhood home, ostensibly to care for their ailing mother, but really to lick their wounds and bury their secrets, they are horri¬fied to find the others there. See, we love each other. We just don't happen to like each other very much. But the sisters soon discover that everything they've been running from—one another, their small hometown, and themselves—might offer more than they ever expected.ABOUT ELEANOR BROWNEleanor Brown's writing has been published in anthologies, magazines, and journals. She holds an M.A. in literature and lives in Colorado.A CONVERSATION WITH ELEANOR BROWNQ. What inspired you to write this novel?I got serious about writing a novel the year I turned 30. I said to myself, "Self, this is the year you either do it or give up the dream forever." So, I wrote some really terrible novels in all kinds of genres that helped teach me a great deal about the craft, and finally I thought of a story I'd played around with years before, and that became The Weird Sisters.The core of the story—three very different sisters and their belated coming-of-age—had been with me for a long time, but they were never quite the right sisters and it was never quite the right time. When I'd written absolutely everything I wasn't meant to write, I finally sat down and let the Andreas sisters in.Q. The sisters in the novel are each named after one of Shakespeare's famous heroines: Rosalind from As You Like It, Bianca from The Taming of the Shrew, and Cordelia from King Lear. Why did you choose these three Shakespearean characters in particular, to name the sisters after? How much do the personalities of Rose, Bean, and Cordy align with their Shakespearean counterparts?Bianca and Cordelia's names actually came first—Bianca is the beautiful second daughter in The Taming of the Shrew, so with what I knew about her character when I began, that was the natural choice. And Cordelia is the devoted youngest of three daughters in King Lear, so that was another obvious one. I struggled with Rosalind's name for much longer, but I wanted her to be a little bit in love with the idea of being in love. I had a memory of seeing the Royal Shakespeare Company doing As You Like It in Stratford-upon-Avon. There is a scene where Rosalind—this bright, intelligent, opinionated woman—is running around the forest, plucking the love poems Orlando has written for her off the branches of trees, and they had staged it so beautifully, and I just thought, 'Yes. That's exactly what she's like.' And so she became Rose.The sisters do bear some resemblance to Shakespeare's characters, and that's something each of them wrestles with in the novel. But I didn't want their stories to be a retelling of the plays (Shakespeare's done that already, and he's rather good), so each sister ultimately follows her own path.Q. How did the title of the novel come about? What is its significance?For a long time, the working title of the book was "Trinity." I really wanted to focus on the importance of the number three, and religion was going to be a bigger part of the novel. But when I created the father and the family began to take shape around the form of his devotion to Shakespeare, I knew I was going to need a different title. There's a portion of the book where the sisters explain that "weird" didn't mean to Shakespeare what it means to us—the three witches in Macbeth are really the three Fates. The Andreas sisters are quite tied to the idea of destiny, and part of the story is their learning to accept what their fates really are, rather than heading grimly down the path of what they think they ought to be.Q. The novel offers a vivid portrait of the conflicted relationship between sisters. As one of three sisters yourself, how much of the novel is based on your own sibling experience?I don't know anyone who has a purely positive relationship with his or her family—I think it's impossible to be that close to anyone and not have moments where your family drives you absolutely crazy. And that's what the Andreas sisters have—they don't hate each other, and they share a wonderful family history that binds them whether they like it or not, but they've never bothered to discover what they love about each other. I think the core of what's difficult about having three siblings—someone always gets left out, the competition for family "roles"—is something I experienced, but the Andreas sisters are all their own.Q. If you were one of the three sisters—Rose, Bean, or Cordy—which would you be?I already am all three of them! I think there's a little bit of each of the sisters in all of us—a little bit of longing for adventure or glamour, a little bit of wanting nothing but safety, a little bit of care-taking and a little bit of risk-taking. I definitely drew on those conflicting desires in myself when I was creating the Andreas sisters.Q. How do you explore the theory of birth order (the idea that sibling personalities are in part shaped by the order in which they were born) in the book? What interests you about this idea?Birth order theory has always fascinated me—the idea that a large part of our personality comes from where we are in our family—only, first, middle, youngest—and the ways our families keep us in those roles even as we grow up. With many people I find it easy to tell where they fall in their family's birth order, no matter how old they are or what their relationship with that family is like. It's something we carry with us whether we like it or not.With The Weird Sisters, I wondered what would happen if life forced us to step out of those prescribed roles: if you've always been the responsible one, how do you deal with being asked to take risks? If you've been cast as undependable, how could you prove that you are capable of more?Q. The novel is in part an homage to books and reading—the Andreas family is one of compulsive readers. Their love of literature is a large part of their familial bond. What role did books play in your own life growing up?My parents raised my two older sisters and me in a house full of books, where the most important life lesson we learned was never to go anywhere without taking something to read, and no dinner conversation is complete without the consultation of at least one reference book.Reading was—and is—the center of my life. I was lucky to be raised by parents who considered reading the most important thing we could do. We took weekly trips to the library, filling canvas bags with books until they overflowed. I was allowed a half hour of television per week, and at the time I chafed at that, but now I'm incredibly grateful. I've always been a daydreamer, and books let my imagination run wild in the most delightful ways.Q. The father in the novel is a renowned Shakespearean professor, and Shakespearean verse is woven throughout the book. How did this element of the book come about? Is the Bard a personal passion of yours?The beginning of this book came about when I was in graduate school, getting my Master's degree, and some of my professors were encouraging me to go for a Ph.D. And my immediate and visceral reaction was—I don't want to know that much about any one thing. But people who do want to know that much about one subject fascinate me, and I wondered what it would be like to be in a family with someone who was so completely obsessed with a single topic.I'm not a Shakespearean scholar, though I did take a wonderful course on Shakespeare in graduate school with a professor in whose memory the father is named—James Andreas. I've read and seen a number of the plays, but definitely not all. I did an enormous amount of research while writing the book, but a lot of that fell by the wayside as I wrote, because what I realized is that when you live in a world so focused on one thing, it becomes part of the landscape. The verse the family quotes to each other is absolutely stripped of any context or meaning; they've long ago had all the deep thoughts about Shakespeare that they're going to have. But the sheer volume of Shakespeare's work, as well as his continuing prominence, made him the natural choice.Q. The novel is written in first person plural, narrated from the collective perspective of the three sisters. How did you make this stylistic choice? What is its effect?Like any writer, I have done a lot of playing around with different styles and voices, and I noticed that while there were people doing first and third, and even, rarely, second-person narration, almost no one did first person plural. When I mentioned I was working on something in this voice, a professor and friend of mine mentioned Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily", and I immediately went and read it. It's a tricky voice, and I had to devise a lot of rules for how to use it—how to make it readable and noticeable without its being disruptive.I chose it because this is a story about family, and one of the ideas I wanted to raise is that we carry our families of origin with us always. They helped form the way in which we see the world, for better or worse, and no matter how we may feel about them now, they are part of us. Even though Rose and Bean and Cordy are not close, they cannot separate themselves from their common history.Q. In the novel, the sisters have reached a crisis point in their lives, where they have to reassess who they are and what their lives have become. How do the sisters struggle with the idea of adulthood? What does it mean to be an adult?Each of the sisters has a strong idea about what it means to be an adult, and each of them is at least partially wrong. Each sister's figuring out how to be an adult is a major theme of the novel, and it was something I continue to wrestle with. Most days my friends and I still don't feel like grown-ups, even though we have mortgages or kids or careers or retirement savings or wrinkles, and many of us have all of the above. I wrote the book partly as an effort to figure out what it means to be an adult, and I have to say I'm still not sure. Maybe what I came out with was the idea that it's more important to build a life that's meaningful to you than to worry about when, precisely, you get to call yourself a responsible adult, and whether your version of adulthood is as good as everyone else's.Q. In the novel, the Andreas sisters have come home in part because their mother has been diagnosed with breast cancer. Did this element of the novel arise out of your personal experience?Absolutely. My mother was diagnosed with breast cancer when I was a teenager (she's just celebrated her 20th anniversary as a survivor). I remember her battle in flashes—seeing her scar when she stepped out of the shower, the darkness and stillness of her bedroom in the days following her chemo treatments, the way one of our cats loved to sleep laid out along the side of her body where she no longer had a breast. I've been trying to write out what that meant to me and to my family ever since.Q. What was your process of writing this book? How long did it take you?The seed of it started years before I ever actually produced The Weird Sisters as it is now. I had a number of fits and starts on a story of three sisters, but when I finally got serious about it, it took me about a year to write the first draft. Writing for me starts slowly, and then I hit a point where I just fall in love with the characters and absolutely cannot stay away from them, to the point that when I'm not actually writing, I'm wondering what they're up to or what they're going to do next.Q. When did you decide to become a writer? Was it something you always aspired to?I can't remember a time when I wasn't writing, and I always knew, despite many people's cautions that I should do something more reliable with my time, that I'd end up as a writer of some sort.But mostly writing is just an excuse to daydream and read, my two very favorite activities.Q. What writers have inspired or influenced your work?Like the Andreas sisters, I will read anything that lands front of me: shampoo bottles, grocery store flyers, short stories, magazine articles, but novels are my favorite form of storytelling. Jodi Picoult's work taught me how to manage multiple narrators, and to write not just what I know, but what I am willing to research. Maeve Binchy's writing taught me how multiple storylines can weave together and support each other, and the importance of writing loveable characters, even if they're not nice people. If I can ever produce one sentence half as beautiful as what Alice Hoffman and Pat Conroy write on their grocery lists, I'd die happy—they are two of the most lyrical prose writers I've encountered.I'm a big fan of Steve Almond's writing, and a class I took with him crystallized some really important things about writing, lessons I took back to revisions of The Weird Sisters and the next novel I'm working on. I'm tremendously grateful to him for that.Q. What do you plan to write next?I'm working on a novel about love and weddings and marriage and divorce, and what happens when they all intersect.DISCUSSION QUESTIONSThe Andreas family is dedicated to books, particularly Shakespeare. Would the family be different if their father were an expert on a different writer? Edgar Allan Poe, let's say, or Mark Twain? What if they were a family of musicians or athletes, rather than readers? How might that change their dynamic? Is there an interest that unites your family in the same way that reading unites the Andreas family?The narration is omniscient first person plural ("we" rather than "I"). Why do you think the author chose to write the novel in this way? Did you like it?Which sister is your favorite? Why? Which sister do you most identify with? Are they the same character?Do you have any siblings? If so, in what way is your relationship with them similar to the relationship among the Andreas sisters? In what way is it different?Each of the sisters has a feeling of failure about where she is in her life and an uncertainty about her position as a grown-up. Are there certain markers that make you an adult, and if so, what are they?In what ways are the sisters' problems of their own making? Does this make them more or less sympathetic?The narrator says that God was always there if the family needed him, "kind of like an extra tube of toothpaste under the sink." Is that true, or does the family's religion have a larger effect on the sisters than they claim? How does your own family's faith, or lack thereof, influence you?In many ways, the Andreas sisters' personalities align with proposed birth-order roles: Rose, the driven caregiver; Bean, the rebellious pragmatist; and Cordy, the free-spirited performer. How important do you think birth order is? Do you see those traits in your own family or in people you know?Father Aidan tells Bean, "Your story, Bean, is the story of your sisters. And it is past time, I think, for you to stop telling that particular story, and tell the story of yourself. Stop defining yourself in terms of them. You don't just have to exist in the empty spaces they leave." Do you agree with Father Aidan? Is it possible to identify one's self not in relationship to one's siblings or family?Is it irresponsible of Cordy to keep her baby?How does the Andreas family deal with the mother's illness? How would your family have coped differently?The sisters say that "We have always wondered why there is not more research done on the children of happy marriages." How does their parents' love story affect the sisters? How did your own parents' relationship affect you?What do you think of the sisters' father, James? Is he a good parent? What about their mother?Why do you think the mother is never given a name?The narrators' mother admits that she ended up with the girls' father because she was scared to venture out into the world. Yet she doesn't seem to have any regrets. Do you think there are people who are just not meant to leave home or their comfort zone?Bean and Cordy initially want to leave Barnwell behind, yet they remain, while Rose is the one off living in Europe. Do you think people sometimes become constrained by childhood perceptions of themselves and how their lives will be? How is your own life different from the way you thought it would turn out?When you first saw the title, The Weird Sisters, what did you think the book would be about? What do you think the title really means?

Editorial Reviews

"Irresistible." — The Boston Globe"Lovely...This novel should appeal to Shakespeare lovers, bibliophiles, fans of novels in academic settings, and stories of sisterhood. The narration is a creative and original blending of the three 'Weird Sisters' as one." — Library Journal"Brown writes sweetly of the transition so many adults struggle to make before their parents' eyes, from children to caretakers themselves." — The Cleveland Plain Dealer