A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society by Margaret GilbertA Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society by Margaret Gilbert

A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society

byMargaret Gilbert

Paperback | April 17, 2008

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 295 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


Margaret Gilbert offers an incisive new approach to a classic problem of political philosophy: when and why should I do what the laws of my country tell me to do? Beginning with carefully argued accounts of social groups in general and political societies in particular, the author argues thatin central, standard senses of the relevant terms membership in a political society in and of itself obligates one to support that society's political institutions. The obligations in question are not moral requirements derived from general moral principles, as is often supposed, but a matter ofone's participation in a special kind of commitment: joint commitment. An agreement is sufficient but not necessary to generate such a commitment. Gilbert uses the phrase 'plural subject' to refer to all of those who are jointly committed in some way. She therefore labels the theory offered in thisbook the plural subject theory of political obligation. The author concentrates on the exposition of this theory, carefully explaining how and in what sense joint commitments obligate. She also explores a classic theory of political obligation --- actual contract theory --- according to which one is obligated to conform to the laws of one's countrybecause one agreed to do so. She offers a new interpretation of this theory in light of a theory of plural subject theory of agreements. She argues that actual contract theory has more merit than has been thought, though the more general plural subject theory is to be preferred. She compares andcontrasts plural subject theory with identification theory, relationship theory, and the theory of fair play. She brings it to bear on some classic situations of crisis, and, in the concluding chapter, suggests a number of avenues for related empirical and moral inquiry.Clearly and compellingly written, A Theory of Political Obligation will be essential reading for political philosophers and theorists.
Margaret Gilbert is Professor of philosophy at the University of Connecticut, Storrs. Educated at Cambridge and Oxford Universities she has held visiting positions as teacher and researcher at numerous institutions including Princeton University, UCLA, the Institute for Advanced Study, Oxford University and King's College London. Her ...
Title:A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of SocietyFormat:PaperbackDimensions:344 pages, 9.21 × 6.14 × 0.98 inPublished:April 17, 2008Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:019954395X

ISBN - 13:9780199543953

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

I. A central problem of political obligation1. The problem2. Obligations: initial points3. In pursuit of political obligation4. Actual contract theory: attractions5. Actual contract theory: objectionsII. Societies, membership, and obligation6. Social groups: starting small7. Joint commitment and obligation8. Societies as plural subjectsIII. A theory of political obligation9. Political societies10. Reconsidering actual contract theory11. The plural subject theory of political obligation12. Summary and prospect

Editorial Reviews

`Review from previous edition Does membership in a political society, in and of itself, involve obligations to uphold that society's political institutions? Margaret Gilbert offers a novel argument in defense of an affirmative answer to this question . . . As a renewed and improved defense oftwo historical accounts rarely given much credence today, namely an argument by appeal to conceptual analysis and an argument by appeal to actual consent, Gilbert's book deserves the attention of all those concerned with the topic of political obligation. Moreover, given her intriguing analysis of awide range of social phenomena, including promises and agreements, Gilbert's book merits the attention of a wider audience as well.'David Lefkowitz, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews