British And American Naval Power: Politics And Policy, 1900-1936

Hardcover | April 1, 1998

byPhillips Payson O'Brien

not yet rated|write a review
U.S. and British naval power developed in quite different ways in the early 20th century before the Second World War. This study compares, contrasts, and evaluates both British and American naval power as well as the politics that led to the development of each. Naval power was the single greatest manifestation of national power for both countries. Their armies were small and their air forces only existed for part of the period covered. For Great Britain, naval power was vital to her very existence, and for the U.S., naval power was far and away the most effective tool the country could use to exercise armed influence around the world. Therefore, the decisions made about the relative strengths of the two navies were in many ways the most important strategic choices the British and American governments ever made. An important book for military historians and those interested in the exercise and the extension of power.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$159.86 online
$180.50 list price (save 11%)
In stock online
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

U.S. and British naval power developed in quite different ways in the early 20th century before the Second World War. This study compares, contrasts, and evaluates both British and American naval power as well as the politics that led to the development of each. Naval power was the single greatest manifestation of national power for bo...

Format:HardcoverDimensions:288 pages, 9.3 × 6.15 × 1.02 inPublished:April 1, 1998Publisher:Praeger Publishers

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0275958981

ISBN - 13:9780275958985

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of British And American Naval Power: Politics And Policy, 1900-1936

Reviews

Extra Content

Editorial Reviews

.,."O'Briens work is valuable on several counts. It succinctly adumbrates the differences between the two nations' political and popular perceptions of their respective navies and cogently summarizes Britain's streamlined and relatively efficient naval administration with the chaotic, factionalized, and uncoordinated U.S. Navy Department."-The Historian