Cartesian Method and the Problem of Reduction by Emily R. Grosholz

Cartesian Method and the Problem of Reduction

byEmily R. Grosholz

Hardcover | April 30, 1999

not yet rated|write a review

Pricing and Purchase Info

$229.23 online 
Earn 1146 plum® points

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


Cartesian method, construed as a way of organizing domains of knowledge according to the `order of reason', was a powerful reductive tool. Descartes produced important results in mathematics, physics, and metaphysics by relating certain complex items and problems back to simpler elements thatserve as starting points for his inquiries. However, his reductive method also impoverished these domains in important ways, for it tended to restrict geometry to the study of straight line segments, physics to the study of ambiguously constituted bits of matter in motion, and metaphysics to thestudy of the isolated, incorporeal knower. This book examines in detail the impact, negative and positive, of Descartes's method on his scientific and philosophical enterprises, exemplified by the Geometry, the Principles, the Treatise of Man, and the Meditations.

About The Author

Emily R. Grosholz is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Pennsylvania State University.
The Stars of Earth - new and selected poems
The Stars of Earth - new and selected poems

by Emily Grosholz


Pre-order online

Not available in stores

W.E.B. Du Bois on Race and Culture
W.E.B. Du Bois on Race and Culture

by Bernard W. Bell


Available for download

Not available in stores

Shop this author

Details & Specs

Title:Cartesian Method and the Problem of ReductionFormat:HardcoverDimensions:170 pages, 8.5 × 5.43 × 0.71 inPublished:April 30, 1999Publisher:Oxford University Press

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0198242506

ISBN - 13:9780198242505

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Cartesian Method and the Problem of Reduction


Extra Content

Editorial Reviews

'the fundamental thesis does capture something which is clearly at work in Descartes, and it has exactly the consequences for Descartes' work which the author explains'Desmond M. Clarke, University College, Cork, British Journal for the History of Science, 25