Clio Confused: Troubling Aspects Of Historical Study From The Perspective Of U.s. History by David J. RussoClio Confused: Troubling Aspects Of Historical Study From The Perspective Of U.s. History by David J. Russo

Clio Confused: Troubling Aspects Of Historical Study From The Perspective Of U.s. History

byDavid J. Russo

Hardcover | July 1, 1995

not yet rated|write a review

Pricing and Purchase Info

$84.60 online 
$94.95 list price save 10%
Earn 423 plum® points

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

Nations and other political entities are inadequate bases for studying the human past, because the other aspects of human life are not organized along the same lines as these political entities. All communities, including local ones, are amoeba-like, changing size and shape as we observe and probe them. Historians can improve the way they generalize about the past by tailoring their conclusions to the actual evidence they use. By using an array of historical questions of interest to scholars in all of the humanistically oriented disciplines, historians can offer more profound interpretations of their subjects, rather than confining themselves to an explanation of how and why human life evolves or persists through time and space. By doing so, historians can also significantly extend their influence among the general population.

Details & Specs

Title:Clio Confused: Troubling Aspects Of Historical Study From The Perspective Of U.s. HistoryFormat:HardcoverDimensions:176 pages, 9.53 × 6.38 × 0.71 inPublished:July 1, 1995Publisher:GREENWOOD PRESS INC.

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0313296820

ISBN - 13:9780313296826

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Clio Confused: Troubling Aspects Of Historical Study From The Perspective Of U.s. History

Reviews

Extra Content

Editorial Reviews

?Daviv Russo...suggestively engages some of the most important issues facing contemporary historians...raises critical questions about the practice of the historical profession in the late twentieth century.?-Canadian Review of American Studies