Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions after the Cold War by Sarah E. KrepsCoalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions after the Cold War by Sarah E. Kreps

Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions after the Cold War

bySarah E. Kreps

Paperback | January 25, 2011

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 229 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


When the Clinton Administration sent the United States military into Haiti in 1994, it first sought United Nations authorization and assembled a large coalition of allies. With a defense budget 20 times the entire GDP of Haiti, why did the US seek multilateral support when its military couldquickly and easily have overpowered the 7,600-soldier Haitian army? The US has enjoyed unrivaled military power after the Cold War and yet in eight out of ten post-Cold War military interventions, it has chosen to use force multilaterally rather than going alone. Why does the US seek allies when, asthe case of Haiti so starkly illustrates, it does not appear to need their help? Why in other instances such as the 2003 Iraq War does it largely sidestep international institutions and allies and intervene unilaterally?In Coalitions of Convenience, Sarah E. Kreps answers these questions through a study of US interventions after the post-Cold War. She shows that even powerful states have incentives to intervene multilaterally. Coalitions and international organization blessing confer legitimacy and provide ways toshare what are often costly burdens of war. But those benefits come at some cost, since multilateralism is less expedient than unilateralism. With long time horizons--in which threats are distant--states will welcome the material assistance and legitimacy benefits of multilateralism. Short timehorizons, however, will make immediate payoffs of unilateralism more attractive, even if it means foregoing the longer-term benefits of multilateralism. Coalitions of Convenience ultimately shows that power may create more opportunities for states such as the US to act alone, but that the incentives are stacked against doing so. The implications of the argument go beyond questions of how the US uses force. They speak to questions about how the worldworks when power is concentrated in the hands of one state, how international institutions function, and what the rise of China and resurgence of Russia may mean for international cooperation and conflict.
Sarah E. Kreps is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Government at Cornell University. She previously held fellowships at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, and the Miller Center for Public Affairs, University of Virginia. Between 1999-2003, Kreps served as an active duty officer in th...
Title:Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions after the Cold WarFormat:PaperbackDimensions:240 pages, 9.25 × 6.12 × 0.68 inPublished:January 25, 2011Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0199753806

ISBN - 13:9780199753802

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

1. Introduction2. Defining Cooperation under Unipolarity3. Explaining Cooperation in Post-Cold War Military Interventions4. The Gulf War and the New World Order5. Haiti: Quid Pro Quo Multilateralism6. Afghanistan: The Mission Determines the Coalition7. Iraq, the United States, and the 'Coalition of the Willing'8. ConclusionNotesIndex