Comparing Westminster by R. A.W. Rhodes

Comparing Westminster

byR. A.W. Rhodes, John Wanna, Patrick Weller

Paperback | August 28, 2011

not yet rated|write a review

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 263 plum® points

Ships within 1-3 weeks

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


Comparing Westminster explores how the governmental elites in Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa understand their Westminster system. It examines in detail four interrelated features of Westminster systems. Firstly, the increasing centralisation in collective,responsible cabinet government. Second, the constitutional convention of ministerial and collective responsibility. Third, the role of a professional, non-partisan public service. And finally, parliament's relationship to the executive. The authors explain the changes that have occured in theWestminster model by analysing four traditions: royal prerogative, responsible government, constitutional bureaucracy, and representative government. They suggest that each tradition has a recurring dilemma, between centralisation and decentralisation, party government and ministerialresponsibility, professionalisation and politicisation, and finally elitism and participation. They gone on to argue that these dilemmas recur in four present-day debates: the growth of prime ministerial power, the decline in individual and collective ministerial accountability, politicisation ofthe public service, and executive dominance of the legislature. They conclude by identifying five meanings of - or narratives about - Westminster. Firstly, 'Westminster as heritage' - elite actors' shared governmental narrative understood as both precedents and nostalgia. Second, 'Westminster aspolitical tool' - the expedient cloak worn by governments and politicians to defend themselves and criticise opponents. Third, 'Westminster as legitimising tradition' - providing legitimacy and a context for elite actions, serving as a point of reference to navigate this uncertain world. Fourth,'Westminster as institutional category' - it remains a useful descriptor of a loose family of governments with shared origins and characteristics. Finally, 'Westminster as an effective political system' - it is a more effective and efficient political system than consensual parliamentarygovernments. Westminster is a flexible family of ideas that is useful for many purposes and survives, even thrives, because of its meaning in use to elite actors.

About The Author

R.A.W. Rhodes is Professor of Government at the University of Tasmania. John Wanna is Sir John Bunting Professor of Politics and Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University and Professor in Public Policy, Griffith University, Patrick Weller is Professor of Politics and Public Policy...
The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership
The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership

by R. A. W. Rhodes


Available for download

Not available in stores

Interpretive Political Science
Interpretive Political Science

by R.A.W. Rhodes


Available for download

Not available in stores

Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science
Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science

by Mark Bevir


Available for download

Not available in stores

Shop this author

Details & Specs

Title:Comparing WestminsterFormat:PaperbackDimensions:288 pages, 9.21 × 6.14 × 0.68 inPublished:August 28, 2011Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:019969558X

ISBN - 13:9780199695584

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Comparing Westminster


Extra Content

Table of Contents

Preface and AcknowledgementsList of TablesList of Abbreviations1. Looking for Westminster2. Comparing Westminster3. Living Traditions4. Executive and Cabinet5. Ministerial Responsibility6. The Public Service7. Parliaments and Representation8. The Meanings of WestminsterBibliographyIndex