Constitutionalism: The Philosophical Dimension by Alan S. RosenbaumConstitutionalism: The Philosophical Dimension by Alan S. Rosenbaum

Constitutionalism: The Philosophical Dimension

EditorAlan S. Rosenbaum

Hardcover | September 1, 1988

Pricing and Purchase Info

$112.05 online 
$124.50 list price save 10%
Earn 560 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


In our constitutional democracy, the dissent and conflict that are the inevitable consequence of free political dialogue point to the importance of reexamining the philosophical premises on which our conceptions of society and government are based. This volume of original essays reviews the foundations of constitutionalism in classical liberal thought and looks at contemporary philosophical perspectives on a wide range of constitutional issues. Written by a distinguished group of philosophers and constitutional scholars, it provides a deeper understanding of the U.S. Constitution as a political instrument and examines the idea of constitutionalism as it functions in our modern world.
Title:Constitutionalism: The Philosophical DimensionFormat:HardcoverDimensions:288 pages, 9.41 × 7.24 × 0.98 inPublished:September 1, 1988Publisher:GREENWOOD PRESS INC.

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0313256713

ISBN - 13:9780313256714

Look for similar items by category:


Editorial Reviews

?An excellent sampling of current thinking in the theory and practice of constitutionalism. Each essay was written specifically for this volume by well-known legal and political philosophers. The first section presents consistently high-quality papers on the historical roots of constitutionalism. Leslie Armour sees Locke's "equality of opportunity" as central to American constitutionalism, while Wade Robison stresses the influence of Hume. The French tradition is represented by Guy Lafrance's review of Montesquieu and Rousseau. The often-ignored German tradition is explored by Peter Stillman's paper on Hegel and Marx and Mary Gregor's on Kant. Andrew Reck analyzes the philosophical component of the debates leading to the Great Compromise of 1787. The second section deals with current controversies and is equally solid. Jeffrey Reiman defends constitutional legitimacy on moral and contractual grounds against the Critical Legal Studies Movement (CLSM). Mark Tushnet argues for the CLSM noting that the rule of law must be a rule of men which leads to contradictions in liberal legal thought. Milton Fisk writes on the role of property; Peter French writes on military justice; Richard Falk deals with law and foreign affairs; and Rosemary Tong argues for "loose constructionalism" to deal with modern technology. Jeffrie Murphy concludes with sober reflections on the place of religion in the liberal tradition of rights. All in all, a first-rate and provocative example of contemporary philosophical concerns. For graduate collections.?-Choice