Crime and Punishment

Kobo ebook | August 8, 2012

byFyodor Dostoevsky, Richard Pevear, Larissa Volokhonsky

not yet rated|write a review
With the same suppleness, energy, and range of voices that won their translation of The Brothers Karamazov the PEN/Book-of-the-Month Club Prize, Pevear and Volokhonsky offer a brilliant translation of Dostoevsky's classic novel that presents a clear insight into this astounding psychological thriller. "The best (translation) currently available"--Washington Post Book World.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$9.99

Available for download
Not available in stores

From the Publisher

With the same suppleness, energy, and range of voices that won their translation of The Brothers Karamazov the PEN/Book-of-the-Month Club Prize, Pevear and Volokhonsky offer a brilliant translation of Dostoevsky's classic novel that presents a clear insight into this astounding psychological thriller. "The best (translation) currently ...

Format:Kobo ebookPublished:August 8, 2012Publisher:Knopf Doubleday Publishing GroupLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:030782960X

ISBN - 13:9780307829603

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Crime and Punishment

Reviews

Rated 5 out of 5 by from Best book ever written. Perhaps the best book ever written. #plumreview
Date published: 2016-11-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Awesome introduction book for Russian Lit. While reading this, I discovered that books read like a meal. Some are potato chips, others are a backyard BBQ. This one is a buffet or a hearty steak with lots of side dishes. The descriptions are enough to seriously draw you in, like smelling an amazing BBQ down the street. I find this book is better to read in slightly longer sittings because FD creates a world for his characters. After a couple of pages, you can really get into his world. But one shorter reads (10 minutes or so) it's a little tricky to follow the storyline because there is a lot of philosophy and cool quotes. I'll reread this one many times because of the philosophy and I actually care about the characters (1st time in a long time, I'm left feeling I truly know the characters). No spoilers but, FD knows how to serve up an ending! With a title like Crime and Punishment, the mood is a dark and stormy night. But FD never depends on cliches to describe things unless it's more powerful to do so. FD is consistent all the way through with the story and where he brings the characters. I'm moved. Super moved by this book. I read the Bantam Classic version translated by Constance Garnett (March 1981 Version) Her translation is excellent. But PEVEAR & VOLOKHONSKY translation is superior.
Date published: 2016-11-20
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Lengthy but amusing Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky is a novel that takes a lot of dedication to read because of its length, but I found it to be a satisfying experience. The story isn’t like any other I have ever read. The beginning lures you into reading it, and after a while you want to know how the protagonist will change. What I found at first to be confusing were the some of the many different characters that were introduced not only had one name, but had a nickname too, which were used quite often. Constance Garnett did an excellent job of translating. The most interesting part of this novel, I found, was when Raskolnikov, the protagonist, spoke to another about the article he had written some months prior. This argument seemed to be the heart of the novel. “[A]ll men are divided into “ordinary” and “extraordinary”. Ordinary men have to live in submission, have no right to transgress the law, because … they are ordinary. But extraordinary men have a right to commit any crime and to transgress the law in any way, just because they are extraordinary.” (221) By reading that, you can imagine what category Raskolnikov wanted to be a part of. The story commences with Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov, also called Rodya, sneaking out of the room that he rents, because he is “hopelessly in debt to his landlady...” He used to be a student and he used to give lessons to earn some money, but he found himself out of work, and the only pair of clothes he had became too worn out to get any respectable employment. His mother had not sent him money recently because he had her own expenses to take care of. Without money, Raskolnikov has been starving himself, and as a result is suffering from delusions and strange thoughts, and becomes easily irritable. While sitting at a restaurant one day, he overhears a conversation between two men, speaking of a pawnbroker who is so stingy that she buys their items at too low of a price. One man says that he would be doing everyone a favour by killing that old lady, the pawnbroker. But he wouldn’t actually do it, he concluded. Raskolnikov, however, was very touched by the conversation of the pawnbroker who he has been going to for money. He starts imagining how he would like to kill her in his mind, and goes about trying to initiate his plans. How will Raskolnikov’s life take a sudden turn as a result of his plans? What punishment must he bear because of his crime? “[A]n extraordinary man has the right – that is not an official right, but an inner right – to decide in his own conscience to overstep . . . certain obstacles, and only in case it is essential for the practical fulfilment of his idea (sometimes, perhaps, of benefit to the whole of humanity). … if the discoveries of Kepler and Newton could not have been made known except by sacrificing the lives of one, a dozen, a hundred, or more men, Newton would have had the right, would indeed have been in duty bound . . . to eliminate the dozen or the hundred men for the sake of making discoveries his known to the whole of humanity. But it does not follow that Newton had a right to murder people right and left and to stead every day in the market. … [L]egislators and leaders of men, such as Lycurgus, Solon, Mahomet, Napoleon, and so on, were all without exception criminals, from the very fact that, making new law, they transgressed the ancient one, handed down from their ancestors and held sacred by the people, and they did not stop short at bloodshed either, if that bloodshed – often of innocent persons fighting bravely in defence of ancient law – were of use of their cause. It’s remarkable, in fact, that the majority, indeed, of these benefactors and leaders of humanity were guilty of terrible carnage.” (222) 4/5
Date published: 2010-01-17