Critical Conditions: Postmodernity and the Question of Foundations by Horace L. FairlambCritical Conditions: Postmodernity and the Question of Foundations by Horace L. Fairlamb

Critical Conditions: Postmodernity and the Question of Foundations

byHorace L. Fairlamb

Paperback | June 24, 1994

not yet rated|write a review

Pricing and Purchase Info

$46.44

Earn 232 plum® points

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

The postmodern debate has been heavily influenced by often contradictory conclusions about the foundations of knowledge. Horace Fairlamb contends that philosophy's foundationist quest has usually been misconceived as a choice between "super-science" and theoretical anarchy. Examining the history of foundationism, and providing detailed analysis of the work of leading theorists, including Fish, Foucault, Derrida, Gadamer and Habermas, Dr. Fairlamb argues for a less reductive and less arbitrary conception of knowledge and meaning. The result is an important contribution to the current reevaluation of theoretical discourse.

Details & Specs

Title:Critical Conditions: Postmodernity and the Question of FoundationsFormat:PaperbackDimensions:286 pages, 8.5 × 5.43 × 0.63 inPublished:June 24, 1994Publisher:Cambridge University Press

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0521456657

ISBN - 13:9780521456654

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Critical Conditions: Postmodernity and the Question of Foundations

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

Introduction; 1. Fish's strong conventions: the mind's own world; 2. Brave new words: postmoderism on epistemology; 3. Theory and/or deconstruction: Derrida slippage; 4. Gadamer's universalism: the limits of hermeneutic authority; 5. Critical politics: deconstruction for Americans; 6. Foucault's microphysical politics: big brother is missing; 7. Habermas' neo-formalism: theory as praxis; 8. Critical theory and postmodern localism: rebels without a cause; Conclusion.

From Our Editors

Providing a sophisticated critique of contemporary foundationist debate, this work contributes significantly to the current revaluation of theoretical discourse with implications for philosophers as well as literary theorists.