Debating Gun Control

Paperback | October 28, 2016

byDavid DeGrazia, Lester H. Hunt

not yet rated|write a review
Americans have a deeply ambivalent relationship to guns. The United States leads all nations in rates of private gun ownership, yet stories of gun tragedies frequent the news, spurring calls for tighter gun regulations. The debate tends to be acrimonious and is frequently misinformed andillogical. The central question is the extent to which federal or state governments should regulate gun ownership and use in the interest of public safety. In this volume, David DeGrazia and Lester Hunt examine this policy question primarily from the standpoint of ethics: What would morallydefensible gun policy in the United States look like? Hunt's contribution argues that the U.S. Constitution is right to frame the right to possess a firearm as a fundamental human right. The right to arms is in this way like the right to free speech. More precisely, it is like the right to own and possess a cell phone or an internet connection. Agovernment that banned such weapons would be violating the right of citizens to protect themselves. This is a function that governments do not perform: warding off attacks is not the same thing as punishing perpetrators after an attack has happened. Self-protection is a function that citizens mustcarry out themselves, either by taking passive steps (such as better locks on one's doors) or active ones (such as acquiring a gun and learning to use it safely and effectively).DeGrazia's contribution features a discussion of the Supreme Court cases asserting a constitutional right to bear arms, an analysis of moral rights, and a critique of the strongest arguments for a moral right to private gun ownership. He follows with both a consequentialist case and a rights-basedcase for moderately extensive gun control, before discussing gun politics and advancing policy suggestions.In debating this important topic, the authors elevate the quality of discussion from the levels that usually prevail in the public arena. DeGrazia and Hunt work in the discipline of academic philosophy, which prizes intellectual honesty, respect for opposing views, command of relevant facts, andrigorous reasoning. They bring the advantages of philosophical analysis to this highly-charged issue in the service of illuminating the strongest possible cases for and against (relatively extensive) gun regulations and whatever common ground may exist between these positions.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$27.50

Ships within 1-3 weeks
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

Americans have a deeply ambivalent relationship to guns. The United States leads all nations in rates of private gun ownership, yet stories of gun tragedies frequent the news, spurring calls for tighter gun regulations. The debate tends to be acrimonious and is frequently misinformed andillogical. The central question is the extent ...

David DeGrazia is Professor of Philosophy at George Washington University, where he has been teaching since 1989. He is a well-respected moral philosopher who is especially well-known for his work in applied ethics. DeGrazia's books include Taking Animals Seriously (Cambridge UP, 1996), Human Identity and Bioethics (Cambridge UP, 2...

other books by David DeGrazia

Human Identity and Bioethics
Human Identity and Bioethics

Kobo ebook|May 1 2005

$32.39 online$41.99list price(save 22%)
Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction
Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction

Kobo ebook|Feb 21 2002

$6.19 online$7.99list price(save 22%)
see all books by David DeGrazia
Format:PaperbackDimensions:272 pages, 8.23 × 5.51 × 0.07 inPublished:October 28, 2016Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0190251263

ISBN - 13:9780190251260

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Debating Gun Control

Reviews

Extra Content

Editorial Reviews

"De Grazia and Hunt demonstrate that reasonable disagreement about gun control is possible. Both authors articulate nuanced and thought-provoking positions, and avoid cheap shots and sensational rhetoric." Allen Buchanan, Duke University