Democratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus by George KloskoDemocratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus by George Klosko

Democratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus

byGeorge Klosko

Paperback | March 3, 2004

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 485 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


Liberal theory seeks agreement on political principles in spite of the moral, religious, and philosophical diversity of contemporary societies. Democratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus breaks new ground in developing principles from research on liberal citizen's attitudes towards rights andliberties, distributive justice, and religious beliefs. Because liberal citizens do not generally accept strong individual rights or strongly egalitarian principles of distributive justice, the principles of liberal consensus must be based on almost universal support for democratic politicalsystems and democracy as a value. The details of central liberal principles, including those bearing on democracy itself, must be worked out by appropriate democratic procedures.
George Klosko is a Professor in the Department of Government and Foreign Affairs, University of Virginia.
Title:Democratic Procedures and Liberal ConsensusFormat:PaperbackDimensions:282 pages, 9.21 × 6.14 × 0.61 inPublished:March 3, 2004Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0199270201

ISBN - 13:9780199270200

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

1. Liberal Commitments2. Theoretical Foundations3. Democratic Values4. Religion and Democratic Values5. Support for Democratic Procedures6. Distributive Justice7. Rawl's Political Constructivism and Democratic Values8. Procedural JusticeConclusionAppendixBibliographyIndex

Editorial Reviews

`Provides an excellent example of political theorizing worthy of emulation. Klosko should be applauded for providing a study that is not only engaging and insightful, but also original and a valuable contribution to both the existing literature concerning the character of a viable conceptionof political liberalism and, more generally, the ongoing debate surrounding the nature of an appropriate conception of justice for contemporary pluralistic studies.'European Journal of Political Theory