Did Singapore Have To Fall?: Churchill And The Impregnable Fortress by Karl HackDid Singapore Have To Fall?: Churchill And The Impregnable Fortress by Karl Hack

Did Singapore Have To Fall?: Churchill And The Impregnable Fortress

byKarl Hack, Kevin Blackburn

Paperback | July 21, 2005

Pricing and Purchase Info

$75.92 online 
$81.10 list price save 6%
Earn 380 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store

Quantity:

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

This book provides a sophisticated summary of up-to-date knowledge on the Fall of Singapore, including the critical tensions between Churchill and local commanders. A focus on the role of Churchill, and on his understanding of the guns and Singapore's fortifications, makes the Fortress central to understanding why and how Singapore fell as it did. The book includes a range of quotations that give the flavour of the time and the essence of the debates. No other book allows the reader to get a clear overview of the base, the plans, the campaign, the guns and the remaining heritage, all in one place.
Karl Hack teaches history at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He specialises in Southeast Asian history, imperialism and counterinsurgency. Kevin Blackburn teaches history at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He is an Australian historian w...
Loading
Title:Did Singapore Have To Fall?: Churchill And The Impregnable FortressFormat:PaperbackDimensions:324 pages, 8.75 × 6.35 × 0.68 inPublished:July 21, 2005Publisher:Taylor and FrancisLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0415374146

ISBN - 13:9780415374149

Reviews

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

2. Singapore in 1941

3. The Fatal Decisions

4. The Campaign

5. The Guns of Singapore

6. After the Battle

Index

Editorial Reviews

'... a major and original contribution to what the author's call the "never-ending post-mortem" destined to continue not simply for want of an authoritative inquiry conducted at the time but more especially with ever-changing perspectives'.

A. J. Stockwell (Royal Holloway, University of London), The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History