Entextualizing Domestic Violence: Language Ideology and Violence Against Women in the Anglo-American Hearsay Principle by Jennifer Andrus

Entextualizing Domestic Violence: Language Ideology and Violence Against Women in the Anglo…

byJennifer Andrus

Hardcover | February 18, 2015

not yet rated|write a review

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 408 plum® points

Out of stock online

Not available in stores


Language ideology is a concept developed in linguistic anthropology to explain the ways in which ideas about the definition and functions of language can become linked with social discourses and identities. In Entextualizing Domestic Violence, Jennifer Andrus demonstrates how languageideologies that are circulated in the Anglo-American law of evidence draw on and create indexical links to social discourses, affecting speakers whose utterances are used as evidence in legal situations. Andrus addresses more specifically the tendency of such a language ideology to create thepotential to speak for, appropriate, and ignore the speech of women who have been victims of domestic violence. In addition to identifying specific linguistic strategies employed in legal situations, she analyzes assumptions about language circulated and animated in the legal text and talk used toevaluate spoken evidence, and describes the consequences of the language ideology when it is co-articulated with discourses about gender and domestic violence. The book focuses on the pair of rules concerning hearsay and its exceptions in the Anglo-American law of evidence. Andrus considers legal discourses, including statutes, precedents, their application in trials, and the relationship between such legal discourses and social discourses about domesticviolence. Using discourse analysis, she demonstrates the ways legal metadiscourses about hearsay are articulated with social discourses about domestic violence, and the impact of this powerful co-articulation on the individual whose speech is legally appropriated. Andrus approaches legal rules and language ideology both diachronically and synchronically in this book, which will be an important addition to ongoing research and discussion on the role legal appropriation of speech may have in perpetuating the voicelessness of victims in the legal treatment ofdomestic violence.

About The Author

Jennifer Andrus is an assistant professor of Writing and Rhetoric Studies at the University of Utah, where she teaches courses on rhetorical theory, discourse analysis, and legal rhetoric. Her current research is on domestic violence and the Anglo-American law of evidence, and the ways in which metadiscourses and text production constr...

Details & Specs

Title:Entextualizing Domestic Violence: Language Ideology and Violence Against Women in the Anglo…Format:HardcoverDimensions:232 pages, 9.41 × 6.3 × 1.1 inPublished:February 18, 2015Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0190225831

ISBN - 13:9780190225834

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Entextualizing Domestic Violence: Language Ideology and Violence Against Women in the Anglo-American Hearsay Principle


Extra Content

Table of Contents

AcknowledgementsNote on trial citation formatIntroduction: Language Ideology in the Hearsay Doctrine and the Modern Excited Utterance Exception to Hearsay1. Legal Discourse of Domestic Violence: Language Ideology and TrustworthinessPart I: Anglo-American Law and the In/admissibility of Hearsay2. Legal Empiricism in/and the Language Ideology of Hearsay3. Social Discourses about Domestic Violence and Hearsay: Interdiscursivity and Indexicality in the US Supreme CourtPart II: The Excited Utterance Exception in US v. Hadley4. Making the Excited Utterance Legally Intelligible: Shifting Audiences, Contexts, and Speakers5. The Attribution and Disattribution of Discursive Agency in the Excited Utterance Exception to Hearsay6. Conclusions: Language Ideology and the Legal Accounting for Domestic Violence