Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making by Scott BarrettEnvironment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making by Scott Barrett

Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making

byScott Barrett

Paperback | November 18, 2005

Pricing and Purchase Info

$45.45 online 
$58.95 list price save 22%
Earn 227 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


Ships within 1-3 weeks

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


Environmental problems like global climate change and stratospheric ozone depletion can only be remedied if states cooperate with one another. But sovereign states usually care only about their own interests. So states must somehow restructure the incentives to make cooperation pay. This iswhat treaties are meant to do. A few treaties, such as the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, succeed. Most, however, fail to alter the state behaviour appreciably. This book develops a theory that explains both the successes and the failures. In particular, the book explains when treaties are needed,why some work better than others, and how treaty design can be improved. The best treaties strategically manipulate the incentives states have to exploit the environment, and the theory developed in this book shows how treaties can do this. The theory integrates a number of disciplines, including economics, political science, international law, negotiation analysis, and game theory. It also offers a coherent and consistent approach. The essential assumption is that treaties be self-enforcing-that is, individually rational, collectivelyrational, and fair. The book applies the theory to a number of environmental problems. It provides information on more than three hundred treaties, and analyses a number of case studies in detail. These include depletion of the ozone layer, whaling, pollution of the Rhine, acid rain, over-fishing, pollution of theoceans, and global climate change. The essential lesson of the book is that treaties should not just tell countries what to do. Treaties must make it in the interests of countries to behave differently. That is, they must restructure the underlying game. Most importantly, they must create incentives for states to participate in atreaty and for parties to comply.
Scott Barrett is Professor of Environmental Economics and International Political Economy at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University. He was educated in the US, Canada, and Britain and taught previously at the London Business School.
Title:Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-MakingFormat:PaperbackDimensions:456 pages, 9.21 × 6.14 × 0.99 inPublished:November 18, 2005Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0199286094

ISBN - 13:9780199286096


Table of Contents

1. Introduction2. The North Pacific Fur Seal Treaty and the Theory of International Cooperation3. Transnational Cooperation Dilemmas4. Games with Multiple Equilibria5. Customary Rights and Responsibilities6. International Environmental Agreements7. The Treaty Participation Game8. The Montreal Protocol9. Tipping Treaties10. Compliance and the Strategy of Reciprocity11. The Depth and Breadth of International Cooperation12. Trade Leakage and Trade Linkage13. The Side Payments Game14. Summary15. Global Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol

Editorial Reviews

`Every now and again, a treatise appears that alters the way we see events. Scott Barrett's Environment andStatecraft is one such work. The book, more than a decade in preperation, is a craft of inventiveness, meticulous research, intellectual insight and surprise. Barrett's book is probably one of the most important publications in thepast few decades on global environmental problems. For students of politics, economics and the environment, and fornegotitators and politicians, this book is to be carried around like a Bible. If I had written it, I would retire content that I had made a real difference.'David Pearce, UCL and Imperial College, London - Times Higher Education Supplement 24/10/2003