Evidence Of The Law: Proving Legal Claims by Gary LawsonEvidence Of The Law: Proving Legal Claims by Gary Lawson

Evidence Of The Law: Proving Legal Claims

byGary Lawson

Hardcover | February 21, 2017

Pricing and Purchase Info

$64.90 online 
$71.50 list price save 9%
Earn 325 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


How does one prove the law? If your neighbor breaks your window, the law regulates how you can show your claim to be true or false; but how do you prove that in breaking your window your neighbor has broken the law? American jurisprudence devotes an elaborate body of doctrine—and an equally elaborate body of accompanying scholarly commentary—to worrying about how to prove facts. It establishes rules for the admissibility of evidence, creates varying standards of proof, and assigns burdens of proof that determine who wins or loses when the facts are unclear. But the law is shockingly inexplicit when addressing these issues with respect to the proof of legal claims. Indeed, the entire language of evidentiary proof, so sophisticated when it comes to questions of fact, is largely absent from the American legal system with respect to questions of law.

As Gary Lawson shows, legal claims are inherently objects of proof, and whether or not the law acknowledges the point openly, proof of legal claims is just a special case of the more general norms governing proof of any claim. As a result, similar principles of evidentiary admissibility, standards of proof, and burdens of proof operate, and must operate, in the background of claims about the law. This book brings these evidentiary principles for proving law out of the shadows so that they can be analyzed, clarified, and discussed. Viewing legal problems through this lens of proof illuminates debates about everything from constitutional interpretation to the role of stipulations in litigation. Rather than prescribe resolutions to any of those debates, Evidence of the Law instead provides a set of tools that can be used to make those debates more fruitful, whatever one’s substantive views may be. As lawyers, judges, and legal subjects confront uncertainty about what the law is, they can, should, and must, Lawson argues, be guided by the same kinds of abstract considerations, structures, and doctrines long used to make determinations about questions of fact.
Gary Lawson is the Philip S. Beck Professor at the Boston University School of Law. He is coauthor of The Origins of the Necessary and Proper Clause and The Constitution of Empire: Territorial Expansion and American Legal History and the author of seven editions of Federal Administrative Law. He lives in Acton, MA.
Title:Evidence Of The Law: Proving Legal ClaimsFormat:HardcoverDimensions:264 pages, 9 × 6 × 0.9 inPublished:February 21, 2017Publisher:University of Chicago PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:022643205X

ISBN - 13:9780226432052

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

Chapter 1.       The Formal Structure of Proof
Chapter 2.       Proving the Law
Chapter 3.       Proof in Interpretation           
Chapter 4.       Understanding Indeterminacy           
Chapter 5.       Building the Imperfect Evidence Set
Chapter 6.       Stipulating the Law
Chapter 7.       Selecting Standards of Proof

Editorial Reviews

“This is a very, very good book. Evidence of the Law is original, smart, careful, and extremely well-written, and makes a genuinely valuable contribution on a topic of major significance to virtually every field of law. It strikes just the right balance between high theory and the discussion of real-world legal examples and practical problems; between backward-looking analysis and forward-looking suggestions; and between seriousness and lighthearted humor. As Lawson says in his conclusion, ‘This book was not written in order to argue. It was written in order to help start a conversation. I believe that there is value in talking about evidence of the law. What say you?’  Speaking for myself, I will be delighted to join that conversation.”