Experiencing Other Minds In The Courtroom

Hardcover | December 22, 2016

byNeal Feigenson

not yet rated|write a review
Sometimes the outcome of a lawsuit depends upon sensations known only to the person who experiences them, such as the buzzing sound heard by a plaintiff who suffers from tinnitus after an accident. Lawyers, litigants, and expert witnesses are now seeking to re-create these sensations in the courtroom, using digital technologies to simulate litigants’ subjective experiences and thus to help jurors know—not merely know about—what it is like to be inside a litigant’s mind. But with this novel type of evidence comes a host of questions: Can anyone really know what it is like to have another person’s sensory experiences? Why should courts allow jurors to see or hear these simulations? And how might this evidence alter the ways in which judges and jurors do justice?

In Experiencing Other Minds in the Courtroom, Neal Feigenson turns the courtroom into a forum for exploring the profound philosophical, psychological, and legal ramifications of our efforts to know what other people’s conscious experiences are truly like. Drawing on disciplines ranging from cognitive psychology to psychophysics to media studies, Feigenson harnesses real examples of digitally simulated subjective perceptions to explain how the epistemological value of this evidence is affected by who creates it, how it is made, and how it is presented. Through his close scrutiny of the different kinds of simulations and the different knowledge claims they make, Feigenson is able to suggest best practices for how we might responsibly incorporate such evidence into the courtroom.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$58.50

Pre-order online
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

Sometimes the outcome of a lawsuit depends upon sensations known only to the person who experiences them, such as the buzzing sound heard by a plaintiff who suffers from tinnitus after an accident. Lawyers, litigants, and expert witnesses are now seeking to re-create these sensations in the courtroom, using digital technologies to simu...

Neal Feigenson is associate dean and professor in the Quinnipiac University School of Law. He is the author of Legal Blame: How Jurors Think and Talk About Accidents and coauthor of Law on Display: The Digital Transformation of Legal Persuasion and Judgment. He lives in Woodbridge, CT.

other books by Neal Feigenson

Law on Display: The Digital Transformation of Legal Persuasion and Judgment
Law on Display: The Digital Transformation of Legal Per...

Kobo ebook|Oct 1 2009

$25.29 online$32.81list price(save 22%)
Format:HardcoverDimensions:240 pages, 9 × 6 × 0.98 inPublished:December 22, 2016Publisher:University Of Chicago PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:022641373X

ISBN - 13:9780226413730

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Experiencing Other Minds In The Courtroom

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

Chapter One: Simulating Subjectivity
Chapter Two: Knowing Other Minds, Simulating Worlds 
Chapter Three: Simulations as Evidence: Conceptual and Legal Overview 
Chapter Four: “That’s What I See!” 
Chapter Five: The Science of Subjectivity 
Chapter Six: Ex Machina 
Chapter Seven: Judging the Person 
Chapter Eight: The Future of Simulations 
Acknowledgments 
Notes 
References 
Index

Editorial Reviews

“A first-rate, original piece of scholarship, Experiencing Other Minds in the Courtroom breaks new and exciting ground in the field of tort law. Feigenson’s erudition is extraordinary. Addressing developments in their infancy, but which promise much expanded use in the future, he looks at the use of demonstrative evidence intended to provide juries with insight into the subjective experiences of litigants who are making claims about an injury, such as vision or hearing loss. This lucid book will be useful for law teachers and helpful for legal practitioners, from plaintiff and defense lawyers to judges who are faced with ruling, commenting, and instructing juries on such evidence. It is a very important contribution.”