Factional Politics: How Dominant Parties Implode or Stabilize by Françoise BoucekFactional Politics: How Dominant Parties Implode or Stabilize by Françoise Boucek

Factional Politics: How Dominant Parties Implode or Stabilize

byFrançoise Boucek

Hardcover | October 29, 2012

Pricing and Purchase Info

$129.93 online 
$156.00 list price save 16%
Earn 650 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


Drawing on theories of neo-institutionalism to show how institutions shape dissident behavior, Boucek develops new ways of measuring factionalism and explains its effects on office tenure. In each of the four cases - from Britain, Canada, Italy and Japan - intra-party dynamics are analyzed through times series and rational choice tools.
FRANÇOISE BOUCEK is a Lecturer in the School of Politics and International Relations at Queen Mary University of London, UK. Her research interests include political parties and party systems, party government and representative democracy.
Title:Factional Politics: How Dominant Parties Implode or StabilizeFormat:HardcoverDimensions:288 pagesPublished:October 29, 2012Publisher:Palgrave Macmillan UKLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0230019935

ISBN - 13:9780230019935

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

List of Tables and Figures
1. The Theory of One-Party Dominance
2. Why Does One-Party Dominance End in Factionalism
3. Majoritarian Democracies: Executive-Dominated Britain and Decentralised Canada
4. Case 1 - The Thatcher-Major Factional Wars Over Europe
5. Case 2 - The Demise of Canadian Liberal Hegemony
6. Non-Majoritarian Democracies: Centrifugal Italy and Consensual Japan
7. Case 3 - Italy's Christian Democrats: How Factional Capture Bred Self-Destruction
8. Case 4 - The Liberal Democratic Party of Japan (1955-2009): End of Hegemony
Conclusion: How Parties Succeed or Fail to Manage Factionalism and Stay in Power

Editorial Reviews

'Boucek makes an important contribution to explaining the politics of single-party dominance by integrating consideration of both inter- andintra-party politics. By challenging the unitary actor assumption ofinter-party accounts, she offers a fuller picture of both the maintenance and the decline of single-party dominance. She highlights the importance of institutional incentives and electoral market conditions in shaping the behaviour of factions within a dominant party, and hence its ability to maintain its dominant position.'- Professor Richard S. Katz, Department of Political Science, The John Hopkins University