Gladstone, Whiggery, and the Liberal Party 1874-1886 by T. A. JenkinsGladstone, Whiggery, and the Liberal Party 1874-1886 by T. A. Jenkins

Gladstone, Whiggery, and the Liberal Party 1874-1886

byT. A. Jenkins

Hardcover | April 30, 1999

Pricing and Purchase Info

$236.25 online 
$472.50 list price save 50%
Earn 1,181 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


This reassessment of the role of the aristocratic Whigs in the Liberal Party of the 1870s and 1880s studies the largely neglected Whig leadership of Granville and Hartington (1875-80), the leadership crisis of 1879-80, and the strategies of both front and back bench Whigs following Gladstone'sreturn to power in 1880. Traditionally the Whigs have been dismissed as a recalcitrant and increasingly marginal element in an age characterized by `Gladstonian' Liberalism. Dr Jenkin's aim is to restore `Whiggery' to a position of significance in Liberal politics and, in the process, tore-examine Gladstone's leadership and the role played by Radicals such as Joseph Chamberlain in the years leading up to the Home Rule crisis of 1886. In asserting the central importance of the Irish Question to the split in the Liberal Party, the book rejects previous interpretations of the schismas merely the result of class divisions, or the result of cynical manoeuvring for personal advantage by ambitious politicians. The book is based on the author's thesis, which has been awarded the University of Cambridge's Prince Consort Prize for 1988.
Title:Gladstone, Whiggery, and the Liberal Party 1874-1886Format:HardcoverDimensions:336 pages, 8.5 × 5.43 × 0.91 inPublished:April 30, 1999Publisher:Oxford University Press

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:019820129X

ISBN - 13:9780198201298

Look for similar items by category:


Editorial Reviews

'His is certainly a careful narrative and analytical account of parliamentary and cabinet politics, occasionally and rigorously challenging the acccepted truths. Jenkins has put us in his debt by his insights into late Victorian Liberalism and by correcting the scholarly imbalance which hasfavoured Gladstone and radicalism to the detriment of whiggery.'Alvin Jackson, University College, Dublin, Irish Historical Studies