How St. Petersburg Learned To Study Itself: The Russian Idea Of Kraevedenie

Paperback | January 4, 2013

byEmily D. Johnson

not yet rated|write a review

In the bookshops of present-day St. Petersburg, guidebooks abound. Both modern descriptions of Russia’s old imperial capital and lavish new editions of pre-Revolutionary texts sell well, primarily attracting an audience of local residents. Why do Russians read one- and two-hundred-year-old guidebooks to a city they already know well? In How St. Petersburg Learned to Study Itself, Emily Johnson traces the Russian fascination with local guides to the idea of kraevedenie.

Kraevedenie (local studies) is a disciplinary tradition that in Russia dates back to the early twentieth century. Practitioners of kraevedenie investigate local areas, study the ways human society and the environment affect each other, and decipher the semiotics of space. They deconstruct urban myths, analyze the conventions governing the depiction of specific regions and towns in works of art and literature, and dissect both outsider and insider perceptions of local population groups. Practitioners of kraevedenie helped develop and popularize the Russian guidebook as a literary form.

Johnson traces the history of kraevedenie, showing how St. Petersburg–based scholars and institutions have played a central role in the evolution of the discipline. Distinguished from obvious Western equivalents such as cultural geography and the German Heimatkunde by both its dramatic history and unique social significance, kraevedenie has, for close to a hundred years, served as a key forum for expressing concepts of regional and national identity within Russian culture.

How St. Petersburg Learned to Study Itself is published in collaboration with the Harriman Institute at Columbia University as part of its Studies of the Harriman Institute series.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$45.95

In stock online
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

In the bookshops of present-day St. Petersburg, guidebooks abound. Both modern descriptions of Russia’s old imperial capital and lavish new editions of pre-Revolutionary texts sell well, primarily attracting an audience of local residents. Why do Russians read one- and two-hundred-year-old guidebooks to a city they already know well? I...

Emily Johnson is Assistant Professor of Russian Language, Literature, and Culture at the University of Oklahoma.

other books by Emily D. Johnson

I Said Yes: My Story of Heartbreak, Redemption, and True Love
I Said Yes: My Story of Heartbreak, Redemption, and Tru...

Hardcover|Mar 1 2016

$25.53 online$31.00list price(save 17%)
Letters from Catbug
Letters from Catbug

Kobo ebook|Aug 30 2016

$3.92

Kick Ass Girls of Fire & Ice YA Books
Kick Ass Girls of Fire & Ice YA Books

Kobo ebook|Apr 12 2017

$0.00

see all books by Emily D. Johnson
Format:PaperbackDimensions:320 pages, 9 × 6 × 0.72 inPublished:January 4, 2013Publisher:Penn State University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:027105865X

ISBN - 13:9780271058658

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of How St. Petersburg Learned To Study Itself: The Russian Idea Of Kraevedenie

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

Contents

List of Illustrations

Preface and Acknowledgments

A Note on Transliteration and Translations

List of Abbreviations

Introduction Ways of Knowing: Russian Local Studies as an Identity Discipline

1. The Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Tradition

2. The Art Journals of the Silver Age, St. Petersburg Preservationism, and the Guidebook

3. Old Petersburg After the Revolution

4. The Excursion Movement and Excursion Methodology

5. Excursion Primers and Literary Tours

6. Kraevedenie in St. Petersburg

7. Literary Kraevedenie

Conclusion

Notes

Selected Bibliography

Index

Editorial Reviews

“Johnson's scholarship is meticulous, and, in emphasizing the literary foundations of kraevedenie, her monograph will appeal to scholars of Russian literature and culture, as well as those interested in the complex and tortuous evolution of Russian civil society.”

—Michael F. Hamm, The Russian Review