Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence

Paperback | August 7, 2008

byJames Allen

not yet rated|write a review
James Allen presents an original and penetrating investigation of the notion of inference from signs, which played a central role in ancient philosophical and scientific method. Inference from Signs examines an important chapter in ancient epistemology: the debates about the nature ofevidence and of the inferences based on it--or signs and sign-inferences as they were called in antiquity. Special attention is paid to three main issues. Firstly, the relation between sign-inference and explanation. At a minimum, sign-inferences permit us to draw a new conclusion, and they are used in this way in every sphere of life. But inferences must do more than this if they are to play the partsassigned to them by natural philosophers and medical theorists, who appeal to signs to support the theories they put forward to explain the phenomena in their domains. Allen examines the efforts made by Aristotle, the Stoics, the Epicureans, and in medicine to discover what further conditions mustbe satisfied by inferences if they are to advance explanatory purposes.To speak of inference from signs presupposes that the use of signs is a form of reasoning from grounds to a conclusion. However, an alternative nonrational conception is explored, according to which the use of signs depends instead on acquired dispositions to be reminded by one thing or another.This view is traced to its probable origin in the Empirical school of medicine, whence it was taken by Pyrrhonian sceptics, who introduced it into philosophy. Evidence sometimes supports conclusive arguments, but at other times it only makes a conclusion probable. Allen investigates Aristotle's path-breaking attempt to erect standards by which to evaluate non-conclusive but--in Aristotelian terms--reputable inferences. Inference from Signs fills an important gap in the histories of science and philosophy and provides the first comprehensive treatment of this topic.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$64.50

Ships within 1-3 weeks
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

James Allen presents an original and penetrating investigation of the notion of inference from signs, which played a central role in ancient philosophical and scientific method. Inference from Signs examines an important chapter in ancient epistemology: the debates about the nature ofevidence and of the inferences based on it--or sign...

James Allen is professor of philosophy and a fellow of the Center for Philosophy of Science. He has held a visiting appointment at Yale, been a visiting fellow at Clare Hall, Cambridge, and a Stipendiat of the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung at the Universitat Hamburg. His principal interests are in ancient Greek and Roman philosophy....

other books by James Allen

As a Man Thinketh
As a Man Thinketh

Paperback|Feb 2 2007

$6.57

As A Man Thinketh
As A Man Thinketh

Paperback|Jan 28 2013

$12.58

see all books by James Allen
Format:PaperbackDimensions:292 pages, 8.5 × 5.43 × 0.68 inPublished:August 7, 2008Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0199550492

ISBN - 13:9780199550494

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

Study I: Aristotle on sign-inference and related forms of argumentStudy I Appendix A: The text of Rhetoric, II 25, 1403a6-10Study I Appendix B: Were there other developments in Aristotle's rhetorical theory?Study II: Rationalism, Empiricism, and Scepticism: Sextus Empiricus' treatment of sign-inferenceStudy III; The Stoics on sign-inference and demonstrationStudy III Appendix: The evidence for a Dialectical origin of the Stoic theory of signsStudy IV: Epicurean sign-inference in PhilodemusConclusion

Editorial Reviews

`Review from previous edition This excellent book provides a number of new historical and exegetical takes on an important chapter in Hellenistic epistemology. Allen's ideas will be at the centre of future debates in the field. His arguments are not conclusive, and the reader may not find themall convincing, but such is the nature of Hellenistic epistemology.' Ancient Philosophy