Interpreting the Constitution by Kent GreenawaltInterpreting the Constitution by Kent Greenawalt

Interpreting the Constitution

byKent Greenawalt

Hardcover | November 18, 2015

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 248 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


Ships within 1-3 weeks

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


This third volume about legal interpretation focuses on the interpretation of a constitution, most specifically that of the United States of America. In what may be unique, it combines a generalized account of various claims and possibilities with an examination of major domains of Americanconstitutional law. This demonstrates convincingly that the book's major themes not only can be supported by individual examples, but are undeniably in accord with the continuing practice of the United States Supreme Court over time, and cannot be dismissed as misguided.The book's central thesis is that strategies of constitutional interpretation cannot be simple, that judges must take account of multiple factors not systematically reducible to any clear ordering. For any constitution that lasts over centuries and is hard to amend, original understanding cannot becompletely determinative. To discern what that is, both how informed readers grasped a provision and what were the enactors' aims matter. Indeed, distinguishing these is usually extremely difficult, and often neither is really discernible. As time passes what modern citizens understand becomesimportant, diminishing the significance of original understanding. Simple versions of textualist originalism neither reflect what has taken place nor is really supportable.The focus on specific provisions shows, among other things, the obstacles to discerning original understanding, and why the original sense of proper interpretation should itself carry importance. For applying the Bill of Rights to states, conceptions conceived when the Fourteenth Amendment wasadopted should take priority over those in 1791. But practically, for courts, to interpret provisions differently for the federal and state governments would be highly unwise. The scope of various provisions, such as those regarding free speech and cruel and unusual punishment, have expanded hugelysince both 1791 and 1865. And questions such as how much deference judges should accord the political branches depend greatly on what provisions and issues are involved. Even with respect to single provisions, such as the Free Speech Clause, interpretive approaches have sensibly varied, greatlydepending on the more particular subjects involved. How much deference judges should accord political actors also depends critically on the kind of issue involved.
R. Kent Greenawalt is a University Professor at Columbia Law School.
Title:Interpreting the ConstitutionFormat:HardcoverDimensions:512 pages, 9.41 × 6.42 × 1.61 inPublished:November 18, 2015Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0199756155

ISBN - 13:9780199756155

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

PrefacePart I: General Themes1. The Nature of Constitutions: Basic Questions about Their Interpretation2. Multiple Interpretive Criteria3. Original Understanding: What Is Relevant and How Much Does It Count?4. Employing Multiple Standards5. Neutral Principles or "Objective" Standards: Their Relevance and AttainabilityPart II: A Poignant Illustration6. Cruel and Unusual PunishmentPart III: Allocations of Powers7. Federal Separation of Powers8. Federal PowersPart IV: Individual Rights and Norms of Equality9. Freedom of Speech and the Press10. The Religion Clauses11. Criminal Process: The Right to Counsel, Unreasonable Searches and Seizures, and the Privilege against Self-Incrimination12. Equal ProtectionConclusion