Introductory Modal Logic by Kenneth J., Jr. KonyndykIntroductory Modal Logic by Kenneth J., Jr. Konyndyk

Introductory Modal Logic

byKenneth J., Jr. Konyndyk

Paperback | May 31, 1986

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 190 plum® points

Ships within 3-5 weeks

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


Modal logic, developed as an extension of classical propositional logic and first-order quantification theory, integrates the notions of possibility and necessity and necessary implication. Arguments whose understanding depends on some fundamental knowledge of modal logic have always been important in philosophy of religion, metaphysics, and epistemology. Moreover, modal logic has become increasingly important with the use of the concept of “possible worlds” in these areas. Introductory Modal Logic fills the need for a basic text on modal logic, accessible to students of elementary symbolic logic.

Kenneth Konyndyk presents a natural deduction treatment of propositional modal logic and quantified modal logic, historical information about its development, and discussions of the philosophical issues raised by modal logic. Characterized by clear and concrete explanations, appropriate examples, and varied and challenging exercises, Introductory Modal Logic makes both modal logic and the possible-worlds metaphysics readily available to the introductory level student.
Kenneth J. Konyndyk, Jr. (1942–1995) taught in the department of philosophy at Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan.  
Title:Introductory Modal LogicFormat:PaperbackDimensions:144 pages, 9 × 6 × 0.3 inPublished:May 31, 1986Publisher:University Of Notre Dame Press

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0268011591

ISBN - 13:9780268011598

Look for similar items by category:


Editorial Reviews

"Although Konyndyk's format is that of a textbook with exercises and the book presupposes a minimal knowledge of sentential and first-order quantification logic, it is an excellent introduction to modal logic for the general reader. . . . The discussion is always clear and as simple as one could ask." —Religious Studies Review