Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime by Stuart P. GreenLying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime by Stuart P. Green

Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime

byStuart P. Green

Paperback | April 15, 2007

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 267 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


The picture of crime that dominates the popular imagination is one of unambiguous wrong-doing - manifestly harmful acts that are clearly worthy of condemnation. The accompanying picture of the criminal - the thief, the murderer - is a picture of society's failures - to be cast out andre-integrated through a process of punishment and penance. Our understanding of white-collar crime, by contrast, is pervaded by moral and imaginative ambiguity. Such crimes are committed by society's success stories, by the rich and the powerful, and frequently have no visible victim at their root.The problem of marrying these disparate pictures has led to a confusion of the boundaries of white-collar crime. How is it possible to distinguish criminal fraud from mere lawful "puffing", tax evasion from "tax avoidance", insider trading from "savvy investing", obstruction of justice from "zealousadvocacy", bribery from "log rolling", and extortion from "hard bargaining"? How should we, as scholars and students, lawyers and judges, law enforcement officials and the general public, distinguish the lawful from the unlawful, the civil from the criminal? In the first in-depth study of its kind, Stuart Green exposes the ambiguities and uncertainties that pervade the white-collar crimes, and offers an approach to their solution. Drawing on recent cases involving such figures as Martha Stewart, Bill Clinton, Tom DeLay, Scooter Libby, Jeffrey Archer,Enron's Kenneth Lay and Andrew Fastow, and the Arthur Anderson accounting firm, Green weaves together disparate threads of the criminal code to reveal a complex and fascinating web of moral insights about the nature of guilt and innocence and what, fundamentally, constitutes conduct worthy ofpunishment by criminal sanction. Green argues that white-collar crime is best understood through a framework of everyday moral concepts that include not only lying, cheating and stealing, but also coercion, exploitation, disloyalty, promise-breaking, disobediance, and other forms of deception. In the process, he reveals theessentially moral fabric underlying the legal category of white-collar crime.
Stuart Green is the L.B. Porterie Professor of Law at Louisiana State University. A graduate of Yale Law School, he has served as a Fulbright Distinguished Scholar in the United Kingdom and as a Visiting Professor at the University of Michigan Law School. He is co-editor, along with R.A. Duff, of Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special...
Title:Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar CrimeFormat:PaperbackDimensions:312 pages, 9.21 × 6.14 × 0.59 inPublished:April 15, 2007Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:019922580X

ISBN - 13:9780199225804

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

PrefaceIntroductionI Getting StartedThe Meaning of 'White Collar Crime'Some Generalizations About the Moral Content of White Collar CrimeA Three-Part Framework for AnalysisII Defining Moral WrongfulnessCheatingDeceptionStealingCoercion and ExpoitationDisloyaltyPromise-BreakingDisobedianceA Concluding Thought on Moral WrongfulnessIII Finding the Moral Content of White Collar OffensesPerjuryFraudFalse StatementsObstruction of JusticeBriberyExtortion and BlackmailInsider TradingTax EvasionRegulatory OffensesConclusions

Editorial Reviews

`'Mr. Green's book admirably clears away much of the conceptual underbrush surrounding the idea of white-collar crime.... "Lying, Cheating, and Stealing" is strong on moral philosophy, not least in the way it illuminates the gray areas of business conduct. ... [it] will be helpful to anyonethinking about such cases [as Kenneth Lay's].''Andrew Stark, Wall Street Journal, 27 July 2006