Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology by Paul de LacyMarkedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology by Paul de Lacy

Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology

byPaul de Lacy

Paperback | April 1, 2010

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 260 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store

Out of stock online

Not available in stores


'Markedness' refers to the tendency of languages to show a preference for particular structures or sounds. This bias towards 'marked' elements is consistent within and across languages, and tells us a great deal about what languages can and cannot do. This pioneering study presents a groundbreaking theory of markedness in phonology. De Lacy argues that markedness is part of our linguistic competence, and is determined by three conflicting mechanisms in the brain: (a) pressure to preserve marked sounds ('preservation'), (b) pressure to turn marked sounds into unmarked sounds ('reduction'), and (c) a mechanism allowing the distinction between marked and unmarked sounds to be collapsed ('conflation'). He shows that due to these mechanisms, markedness occurs only when preservation is irrelevant. Drawing on examples of phenomena such as epenthesis, neutralisation, assimilation, vowel reduction and sonority-driven stress, Markedness offers an important insight into this essential concept in the understanding of human language.
Title:Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in PhonologyFormat:PaperbackProduct dimensions:468 pages, 9.02 × 5.98 × 1.02 inShipping dimensions:9.02 × 5.98 × 1.02 inPublished:April 1, 2010Publisher:Cambridge University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0521142237

ISBN - 13:9780521142236


Table of Contents

Preface; Acknowledgements; Symbols and abbreviations; 1. What is markedness?; 2. Theory; 3. Markedness reduction; 4. Preservation of the marked; 5. Conflation in reduction; 6. Markedness conflation in preservation; 7. Markedness conflict: vowels; 8. Prediction and alternatives; 9. Conclusions; References; Subject index; Language index.

Editorial Reviews

Review of the hardback: '... de Lacy's theory is the first that provides a comprehensive and coherent framework for inquiring into formal markedness. Once the notion of markedness is defined in such an explicit way, it is easier to examine more of its effects empirically and find its proper formal expression in a theory of grammar.' Tanaka Shin-ichi, University of Tokyo