Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It?s Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won?t Admit It by Richard SanderMismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It?s Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won?t Admit It by Richard Sander

Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It?s Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won?t…

byRichard Sander, Stuart Taylor Jr.

Hardcover | October 9, 2012

Pricing and Purchase Info

$30.54 online 
$32.00 list price
Earn 153 plum® points
Quantity:

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about


The debate over affirmative action has raged for over four decades, with little give on either side. Most agree that it began as noble effort to jump-start racial integration; many believe it devolved into a patently unfair system of quotas and concealment. Now, with the Supreme Court set to rule on a case that could sharply curtail the use of racial preferences in American universities, law professor Richard Sander and legal journalist Stuart Taylor offer a definitive account of what affirmative action has become, showing that while the objective is laudable, the effects have been anything but.

Sander and Taylor have long admired affirmative action's original goals, but after many years of studying racial preferences, they have reached a controversial but undeniable conclusion: that preferences hurt underrepresented minorities far more than they help them. At the heart of affirmative action's failure is a simple phenomenon called mismatch. Using dramatic new data and numerous interviews with affected former students and university officials of color, the authors show how racial preferences often put students in competition with far better-prepared classmates, dooming many to fall so far behind that they can never catch up.Mismatchlargely explains why, even though black applicants are more likely to enter college than whites with similar backgrounds, they are far less likely to finish; why there are so few black and Hispanic professionals with science and engineering degrees and doctorates; why black law graduates fail bar exams at four times the rate of whites; and why universities accept relatively affluent minorities over working class and poor people of all races.

Sander and Taylor believe it is possible to achieve the goal of racial equality in higher education, but they argue that alternative policies#151;such as full public disclosure of all preferential admission policies, a focused commitment to improving socioeconomic diversity on campuses, outreach to minority communities, and a renewed focus on K-12 schooling #151;will go farther in achieving that goal than preferences, while also allowing applicants to make informed decisions. Bold, controversial, and deeply researched,Mismatchcalls for a renewed examination of this most divisive of social programs#151;and for reforms that will help realize the ultimate goal of racial equality.
Richard H. Sanderis a law professor and economist at UCLA who worked as a community organizer on Chicago's South Side, a civil rights activist in Los Angeles, and is a well-known scholar on race and higher education. He lives in Los Angeles.Stuart Taylor, Jr., a formerNew York TimesSupreme Court reporter and co-author of the critically...
Loading
Title:Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It?s Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won?t…Format:HardcoverDimensions:368 pages, 9.5 × 6.38 × 1.12 inPublished:October 9, 2012Publisher:Basic BooksLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0465029965

ISBN - 13:9780465029969

Appropriate for ages: 13

Look for similar items by category:

Reviews

Editorial Reviews

“In the real world, there is little doubt that racial preferences are a failure. In their judicious book Mismatch, Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor Jr. catalog the twisted effect of preferences on schools beholden to them.”—Rich Lowry, National Review Online“[Stuart Taylor's] book is wonderful.... [It's] the most thoughtful account of the possible policy disadvantages of affirmative action in putting students who are mismatched...at universities where they're not prepared.”—Jeffrey Rosen, on NPR's Diane Rehm Show“In their outstanding book, Mismatch, Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor Jr. document the paradoxical results of giving large preferences to racial and other minorities. Sander and Taylor argue persuasively that the trouble with preferences is not the injustice done to people like Abigail Fisher, who was denied admission to the University of Texas while less qualified black and Hispanic applicants were accepted — though that is unfair — but also the harm it does to those to whom such preferences are extended.”—Mona Charen, Creators Syndicate