Philosophical Chaucer: Love, Sex, and Agency in the Canterbury Tales by Mark MillerPhilosophical Chaucer: Love, Sex, and Agency in the Canterbury Tales by Mark Miller

Philosophical Chaucer: Love, Sex, and Agency in the Canterbury Tales

byMark Miller

Paperback | January 29, 2009

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 232 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


While most Chaucer critics interested in gender and sexuality have used psychoanalytic theory to analyze Chaucer's poetry, Mark Miller re-examines the links between sexuality and the philosophical analysis of agency in medieval texts such as the Canterbury Tales, Boethius's Consolation of Philosophy, and the Romance of the Rose. Chaucer's philosophical sophistication provides the basis for a new interpretation of the emerging notions of sexual desire and romantic love in the late Middle Ages.
Title:Philosophical Chaucer: Love, Sex, and Agency in the Canterbury TalesFormat:PaperbackDimensions:304 pages, 9.02 × 5.98 × 0.67 inPublished:January 29, 2009Publisher:Cambridge University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0521100666

ISBN - 13:9780521100663

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

Acknowledgements; Introduction: Chaucer and the problem of normativity; 1. Naturalism and its discontents in the Miller's Tale; 2. Normative longing in the Knight's Tale; 3. Agency and dialectic in the Consolation of Philosophy; 4. Sadomasochism and utopia in the Roman de la Rose; 5. Suffering love in the Wife of Bath's Prologue and Tale; 6. Love's promise: the Clerk's Tale and the scandal of the unconditional; Notes; Bibliography; Index.

Editorial Reviews

"Miller is well qualified to place into dialogue philosophical and theoretical approaches that usually remain sheltered from one another in current literary scholarship. On the one hand, he is well-informed about the best theoretically inflected medieval scholarship, especially queer theory and psychoanalysis; on the other hand, he is equally conversant with the work of contemporary analytical philosophers...It is Miller's refreshing engagement with usually hostile intellectual traditions and his lack of dogmatism that make his book so rewarding....The book is likely to exert a powerful influence on future work." R. James Goldstein, Auburn University, Southern Humanities Review