Philosophical Relativity by Peter UngerPhilosophical Relativity by Peter Unger

Philosophical Relativity

byPeter Unger

Paperback | April 15, 2002

Pricing and Purchase Info

$77.24

Earn 386 plum® points
Quantity:

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

In this short but meaty book, Peter Unger questions the objective answers that have been given to central problems in philosophy. As Unger hypothesizes, many of these problems are unanswerable, including the problems of knowledge and scepticism, the problems of free will, and problems ofcausation and explanation. In each case, he argues, we arrive at one answer only relative to an assumption about the meaning of key terms, terms like "know" and like "cause," even while we arrive at an opposite answer relative to quite different assumptions, but equally arbitrary assumptions, aboutwhat the key terms mean.
Peter Unger is Professor of Philosophy at New York University. He is the author of Ignorance (OUP 1975, 2002), Identity, Consciousness, and Value (OUP 1990), and Living High and Letting Die (1996)
Loading
Title:Philosophical RelativityFormat:PaperbackDimensions:144 pages, 5.98 × 9.02 × 0.51 inPublished:April 15, 2002Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:019515553X

ISBN - 13:9780195155532

Look for similar items by category:

Reviews

Editorial Reviews

"Current debates about contextualism in epistemology begin with Philosophical Relativity, where Unger gives the term 'contextualism' the meaning that, in many philosophical circles, it enjoys today, and gives the position designated by the term its first serious and systematic treatment. Feware likely to accept Unger's 'relativistic' conclusion that the advantages and disadvantages of contextualism and its rival, invariantism, balance out in such a way that there simply is no fact of the matter which is the correct theory, but all who want to think seriously about the issue shouldconfront the challenging arguments in this seminal book."--Keith DeRose, Yale University