Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?: Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry

Paperback | September 1, 2013

byGeorge E. Karamanolis

not yet rated|write a review
George Karamanolis breaks new ground in the study of later ancient philosophy by examining the interplay of the two main schools of thought, Platonism and Aristotelianism, from the first century BC to the third century AD. From the time of Antiochus and for the next four centuries Platonistswere strongly preoccupied with the question of how Aristotle's philosophy compared with the Platonic model. Scholars have usually classified Platonists into two groups, the orthodox ones and the eclectics or syncretists, depending on whether Platonists rejected Aristotle's philosophy as a whole oraccepted some Peripatetic doctrines. Karamanolis argues against this dichotomy. He argues that Platonists turned to Aristotle only in order to discover and elucidate Plato's doctrines and thus to reconstruct Plato's philosophy, and they did not hesitate to criticize Aristotle when judging him to beat odds with Plato. For them, Aristotle was merely auxlilary to their accessing and understanding Plato.Platonists were guided in their judgement about Aristotle's proximity to, or distance from, Plato by their own assumptions about what Plato's doctrines were. Also crucial for their judgement were their views about which philosophical issues particularly mattered. Given the diversity of viewsrehearsed in Plato's works, Platonists were flexible enough to decide which were Plato's own doctrines. The real reason behind the rejection of Aristotle's testimony was not to defend the purity of Plato's philosophy, as Platonists sometimes argued in a rhetorical fashion. Aristotle's testimony wasrejected, rather, because Platonists assumed that Plato's doctrines were views found in Plato's work which Aristotle had discarded or criticized. The evaluation of Aristotle's testimony on the part of the Platonists also depends on their interpretation of Aristotle himself. This is particularlyclear in the case of Porphyry, with whom the ancient discussion reaches a conclusion which most later Platonists accepted. While essentially in agreement with Plotinus's interpretation of Plato, Porphyry interpreted Aristotle in such a way that the latter appeared to agree essentially with Plato onall significant philosophical questions, a view which was dominant until the Renaissance. Karamanolis argues that Porphyry's view of Aristotle's philosophy guided him to become the first Platonist to write commentaries on Aristotle's works.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$52.50

Ships within 1-3 weeks
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

George Karamanolis breaks new ground in the study of later ancient philosophy by examining the interplay of the two main schools of thought, Platonism and Aristotelianism, from the first century BC to the third century AD. From the time of Antiochus and for the next four centuries Platonistswere strongly preoccupied with the question o...

George E. Karamanolis is Assistant Professor in Ancient Philosophy at the University of Crete.

other books by George E. Karamanolis

The Philosophy of Early Christianity
The Philosophy of Early Christianity

Kobo ebook|Sep 3 2014

$52.43

Format:PaperbackDimensions:430 pages, 8.5 × 5.51 × 0.01 inPublished:September 1, 2013Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0199684634

ISBN - 13:9780199684632

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?: Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

Introduction1. Antiochus of Ascalon2. Plutarch3. Numenius4. Atticus5. Ammonius Saccas6. Plotinus7. PorphyryAppendix I: The Platonism of Aristotle and of the early PeripateticsAppendix II: Lists of works by Platonists on Aristotle's philosophy

Editorial Reviews

"a thoughtful book, itself a fertile garden of arguments and positions, rich in historical and linguistic detail" --The Classical Review