Proportional Representation: Critics of the British Electoral System 1820-1945 by Jenifer HartProportional Representation: Critics of the British Electoral System 1820-1945 by Jenifer Hart

Proportional Representation: Critics of the British Electoral System 1820-1945

byJenifer Hart

Hardcover | April 30, 1999

Pricing and Purchase Info

$234.26 online 
$315.00 list price save 25%
Earn 1171 plum® points

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

This is the first scholarly history of the proportional representation movement. Jenifer Hart explores its origins in the early nineteenth century and analyses the contribution of political thinkers such as Thomas Hare and John Stuart Mill. She traces the history of the early campaigns, andthe progress and vicissitudes of the cause during the twentieth century. A final chapter takes the account up to the present day. Based on extensive research, this is an accessible and comprehensive study which throws light on many of the questions which bedevil contemporary political commentators. Mrs Hart demonstrates the inadequacy of the commonly made identification of proportional representation with liberalism, andexplains the failure of its supporters to achieve its adoption in the UK, with the exception of Northern Ireland. Her book makes an important contribution to British constitutional history and to current debates on electoral reform.
Jenifer Hart is at St Anne's College, Oxford.
Title:Proportional Representation: Critics of the British Electoral System 1820-1945Format:HardcoverDimensions:320 pages, 8.5 × 5.43 × 0.94 inPublished:April 30, 1999Publisher:Oxford University Press

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0198201362

ISBN - 13:9780198201366

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Proportional Representation: Critics of the British Electoral System 1820-1945

Reviews

Editorial Reviews

`It is rare for a book to deserve the word "definitive", but Jenifer Hart's history of the advocacy of proportional representation earns the description. She has written a very thorough, painstaking account of the many attempts top convince the British people and the British Parliament that'the-first-past-the-post' method of determining the winner of an election is not consistent with democracy.'Utilitas, Vol. 5, No. 2, November 1993