Proportionality Principles in American Law: Controlling Excessive Government Actions by E. Thomas SullivanProportionality Principles in American Law: Controlling Excessive Government Actions by E. Thomas Sullivan

Proportionality Principles in American Law: Controlling Excessive Government Actions

byE. Thomas Sullivan, Richard S. Frase

Hardcover | December 19, 2008

Pricing and Purchase Info

$22.75 online 
$45.50 list price save 50%
Earn 114 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


Ships within 1-3 weeks

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


From the ancient origins of Just War doctrine to utilitarian and retributive theories of punishment, concepts of proportionality have long been an instrumental part of the rule of law and an essential check on government power. These concepts all embody the fundamental value that governmentand private actions should not be demonstrably excessive relative to their moral and practical justifications. In the American legal system, despite frequent though unacknowledged use of proportionality principles, there is no general theory of what permits courts to invalidate intrusive measures. In Proportionality Principles in American Law, two renowned legal scholars seek to advance such a theory. They argue that standards of review should be more clearly and precisely defined, and that in most circumstances every intrusive government measure which limits or threatens individual rightsshould undergo some degree of proportionality review. Across a wide range of legal contexts, E. Thomas Sullivan and Richard S. Frase identify three basic ways that government measures and private remedies have been found to be disproportionate: relative to fault; relative to alternative means ofachieving the same practical purposes; and relative to the likely practical benefits of the measure or remedy. Using this structure, the book examines the origins and contemporary uses of proportionality principles in public law, civil liberties, and the criminal justice system, emphasizing theutility of proportionality principles to guide judicial review of excessive government measures. By constructing a new framework and a general theory for constitutional judicial review, Proportionality Principles in American Law will help courts more consistently and effectively apply proportionality principles to better serve their vital roles as guardians of individual rights andliberties.
E. Thomas Sullivan is Senior Vice President and Provost of the University of Minnesota and Julius E. Davis Chair in Law. Richard S. Frase is the Benjamin N. Berger Professor of Criminal Law at the University of Minnesota.
Title:Proportionality Principles in American Law: Controlling Excessive Government ActionsFormat:HardcoverDimensions:296 pages, 6.3 × 9.29 × 0.98 inPublished:December 19, 2008Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0195324935

ISBN - 13:9780195324938

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

IntroductionPart I. Origins: From the Annals of History to the Twenty First Century1. Proportionality in International and Foreign Law2. Proportionality Principles in the Common Law of DamagesPart II. Proportionality in American Civil Jurisprudence3. Implicit Proportionality Principles in American Standards of Constitutional Review4. Explicit Proportionality Principles in Discrete Areas of American JurisprudencePart III. Proportionality in American Criminal Justice5. Procedure: Implicit Proportionality Limits on Police Powers and Defendant Rights6. Criminal Law: Implicit Proportionality Limitations on Criminal Liability7. Punishment: Explicit and Implicit Proportionality Limits on Sanction SeverityConclusionIndex