Pseudo-dionysius And The Metaphysics Of Aquinas by Fran O'rourke

Pseudo-dionysius And The Metaphysics Of Aquinas

byFran O'rourke

Paperback | November 3, 2005

not yet rated|write a review

Pricing and Purchase Info

$58.50

Earn 293 plum® points

Ships within 3-5 weeks

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

"This is one of the two or three most important books on Aquinas published in the last fifty years." —Alasdair MacIntyre, University of Notre Dame

Although Pseudo-Dionysius was, after Aristotle, the author whom Thomas Aquinas quoted most frequently, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the role of this Neoplatonist thinker in the formation of Aquinas' philosophy. Fran O'Rourke's book is the only available work that investigates the pervasive influence of Pseudo-Dionysius on Aquinas, while at the same time examining the latter's profound originality. Central themes discussed by O'Rourke include knowledge of the absolute, existence as the first and most universal perfection, the diffusion of creation, the hierarchy of creatures, and their return to God as final end. O'Rourke devotes special attention to the Neoplatonist element in Aquinas' notion of "being" as intensity or degree of perfection. He also considers the relation of being and goodness in light of Aquinas' nuanced reversal of Dionysius' theory of the primacy of the good, and Aquinas' arguments for the transcendental nature of goodness.

About The Author

Fran O’Rourke is senior lecturer in the School of Philosophy at University College Dublin, Ireland.

Details & Specs

Title:Pseudo-dionysius And The Metaphysics Of AquinasFormat:PaperbackDimensions:328 pages, 9 × 6 × 1.2 inPublished:November 3, 2005Publisher:University Of Notre Dame PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0268037248

ISBN - 13:9780268037246

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Pseudo-dionysius And The Metaphysics Of Aquinas

Reviews

Extra Content

Editorial Reviews

“… The completeness of O’Rourke’s survey of the vast quantity of relevant (and often untranslated) text, as well as his extensive knowledge and prudent employment of the multilingual literature, make it a genuinely useful resource for scholars….” —Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 59, 1, January 2008