Rethinking Responsibility

Hardcover | March 1, 2013

byK. E. Boxer

not yet rated|write a review
This book explores moral responsibility, and whether it is compatible with causal determinism. Its author, K. E. Boxer, started out with deeply incompatibilist intuitions but became dissatisfied with the arguments that she and other contemporary incompatibilists marshalled in support of thisview. Rethinking Responsibility has evolved out of her search for a more adequate argument. Boxer suggests that if incompatibilists are to be in a position to provide such an argument, they must shift their attention away from metaphysics and back to what H. L. A. Hart deemed the primary sense ofthe concept of moral responsibility, viz., the sense of liability. To say that an agent is morally responsible for an action in this sense is to say that she satisfies the necessary causal and capacity conditions for desert of certain forms of response. If incompatibilists are to show that among those conditions is a requirement for some form of ultimateresponsibility incompatible with determinism, they must first clarify their understanding of moral desert and the moral responses associated with attributions of responsibility. The book examines different possible understandings of moral liability-responsibility based on different possible accounts of the nature of moral blame, the moral desert of punishment, and the relation between desert of moral blame and desert of punishment. A focal point throughout the discussion iswhether, on any of the possible understandings, moral responsibility would require agents to be ultimately responsible for their actions in a way incompatible with causal determinism. Other issues discussed include what renders a defect a moral defect or a particular criticism a moral criticism, whether moral obligations are act-governing or will-governing, the connection between the moral reactive attitudes and the retributive sentiments, the relevance of the capacity toparticipate in ordinary interpersonal relationships, and whether it is possible to understand the moral desert of punishment in communicative terms. Boxer concludes that incompatibilists face an unenviable choice: either they must adopt an understanding of the moral desert of punishment that manyfind morally problematic, or they must abandon incompatibilism.

Pricing and Purchase Info

$41.74 online
$55.00 list price (save 24%)
Ships within 1-3 weeks
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

This book explores moral responsibility, and whether it is compatible with causal determinism. Its author, K. E. Boxer, started out with deeply incompatibilist intuitions but became dissatisfied with the arguments that she and other contemporary incompatibilists marshalled in support of thisview. Rethinking Responsibility has evolved o...

Karin Boxer received her BA from Princeton University and her BPhil and DPhil from the University of Oxford. She was an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh, and as of autumn 2012 takes up a visiting position at Amherst College.
Format:HardcoverDimensions:192 pages, 8.5 × 5.43 × 0.1 inPublished:March 1, 2013Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0199695326

ISBN - 13:9780199695324

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Rethinking Responsibility

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

Introduction1. Moral Responsibility and Ultimate Responsibility2. Moral Appraisal and Defects of Character3. The Moral Reactive Attitudes4. Moral Desert of Punishment5. The Communicative Understanding of Desert of PunishmentConclusion: What's an Incompatibilist to Do?BibliographyIndex