Rogue Lawyer: A Novel by John GrishamRogue Lawyer: A Novel by John Grisham

Rogue Lawyer: A Novel

byJohn Grisham

Paperback | July 26, 2016

Pricing and Purchase Info

$11.90 online 
$12.99 list price save 8%
Earn 60 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Available in stores


#1 NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • NAMED ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR BY THE WASHINGTON POST AND NPR • Featuring one of John Grisham’s most colorful, outrageous, and vividly drawn characters yet, Rogue Lawyer showcases the master of the legal thriller at his very best.
On the right side of the law—sort of—Sebastian Rudd is not your typical street lawyer. His office is a customized bulletproof van, complete with Wi-Fi, a bar, a small fridge, and fine leather chairs. He has no firm, no partners, and only one employee: his heavily armed driver, who also so happens to be his bodyguard, law clerk, confidant, and golf caddie. Sebastian drinks small-batch bourbon and carries a gun. He defends people other lawyers won’t go near: a drug-addled, tattooed kid rumored to be in a satanic cult; a vicious crime lord on death row; a homeowner arrested for shooting at a SWAT team that mistakenly invaded his house. Why these clients? Because Sebastian believes everyone is entitled to a fair trial—even if he has to bend the law to secure one.
Praise for Rogue Lawyer
“Terrific . . . inventive . . . Grisham still makes it look easy.”—Maureen Corrigan, The Washington Post
“Sebastian Rudd is . . . a kind of twenty-first-century Philip Marlowe . . . with a blunt, rude, gravelly poetic wiseguy voice.”—Benjamin Percy, The New York Times Book Review
“Deeply engaging and entertaining . . . [Grisham finds] intense drama in the little skirmishes that play out across our legal system every day.”—Charles Finch, USA Today
“Grisham has taken a step in an intriguing new direction.”—Janet Maslin, The New York Times
John Grisham is the author of twenty-eight novels, one work of nonfiction, a collection of stories, and six novels for young readers.
Title:Rogue Lawyer: A NovelFormat:PaperbackDimensions:400 pages, 7.47 × 4.15 × 0.89 inPublished:July 26, 2016Publisher:Random House Publishing GroupLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0553393480

ISBN - 13:9780553393484

Look for similar items by category:


Rated 5 out of 5 by from Can't get enough!! Have been a long time lover of John Grisham.....each creation he offers...never disappoints!!!
Date published: 2018-05-27
Rated 3 out of 5 by from good Dark and not your the good guys get what they want. Actually you're not sure who thy are in the end. You have to read to the end cause everything ties in togetter but I like Partner's caracter more then Sebastien. The cage fighting I found was a bit much but that's just me. You will keep guessing and some parts are hard to believe but I'm sure can be part of reality (what happens to his son).
Date published: 2018-05-02
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Loved it! I love all John Grisham books and this was no exception. I love how different his lawyers are and how they get things done. I don't always like their clients but the stories are always page turners. Don't take this book on vacation with you because it will be your focus!
Date published: 2018-02-15
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Rogue Lawyer I loved it, a thriller that wasn't focused on the cops, but the lawyer.
Date published: 2018-02-05
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Really good Enjoyed reading this book. A+!
Date published: 2017-12-09
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Underwhelming Thought that I would give Grisham another try. I'm regretting it.
Date published: 2017-12-05
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Ok but not great. I'm normally a huge Grisham fan but this is one of his weaker stories.
Date published: 2017-11-04
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Page turner A riveting novel. A page turner. The protagonist is believable at times.
Date published: 2017-10-15
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Loved It Enjoyed every moment reading this novel
Date published: 2017-10-13
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Interesting and Different One of Grisham's more shorter novels, but the character is very flawed, yet engaging. The story was a bit slow, but picked up around the middle and I really liked it. Would definitely recommend to a first-time Grisham reader. #plumreview
Date published: 2017-09-21
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Different Seems like a few different stories in one book. I am half way through with perseverance...hoping these all tie together somehow. Kind of a slow book thus far yet interesting at the the same time.
Date published: 2017-09-17
Rated 5 out of 5 by from And Now For Something Completely Different Today's mystery is by a favourite author, John Grisham and is a bit of a departure for him.  The Rogue Lawyer is Sebastian Rudd.  His office is a customized, bullet-proof van, he owns a Puerto Rican cage fighter, and his driver is simply called Partner but he is a firm believer that every defendant deserves a smart defence, police are not always by the book, and even judges are not always fair.  You could describe him as skeptical. The way the chapters are set up, it would appear that these are a disjointed set of short cases but there's a thread running throughout that lays out Rudd's character, his family relationships, and his connections to ruthless criminals and honest cops who have to meet in out-of-the way places that rotate through the first 4 letters of the alphabet.  The cases all dovetail and are extremely fast-moving.  There's lots of tension as Rudd defends an unpopular defendant accused of murdering two little girls, has an accusation of jury tampering thrown at him, has his van blown up, and his cage fighter goes berserk when he loses a fight and attacks the referee who later dies. This is a new style of organization for Grisham and an engaging, almost-shady character.  I learned a lot about cage fighting (which I'll file away, not having any practical use for it), enjoyed the way Rudd generally is able to turn the tables whether on the police, the court system, or the criminals, and found the story just flowed right through to the last page.  Brilliantly written and thoroughly captivating, whether you like cage fighting or not, this is a Grisham novel you won't want to miss.
Date published: 2017-07-10
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great Story! Great story and very well written!
Date published: 2017-07-08
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Good Book!!!! It was a different read for the author but it was very good and enjoyable to read!!!
Date published: 2017-07-06
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Okay read Had a little trouble getting into it, but it was okay
Date published: 2017-06-08
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Good read Grisham returns with a solid effort this time....very interesting read
Date published: 2017-03-16
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Good Story Telling I had a difficult time getting into this book - it seems like numerous novellas. I kept wondering if the stories would all come together somehow, and in true Grisham fashion, they did. Glad I didn't give up! Good story telling!
Date published: 2017-03-03
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Not your normal John Grisham novel I did not enjoy this book as much as other John Grisham's novels. I found the story jumpy and was hard to get into and almost didn't finish reading it.
Date published: 2017-02-24
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Still love John Grisham I didn't realize how much I have missed John Grisham until I read this one. I was actually prepared not to like this one very much as I am not a fan of shorter stories however I was pleasantly surprised. While there were several individual cases, there was still some connecting story lines throughout and I enjoyed them all. John Grisham was who made me love legal thrillers way back when I first read "the firm" when it was released. He writes such an interesting story without the dry boring legal stories others have written. The cases are different and fascinating, his characters very real and I read this one with the same enthusiasm as many others of his. Sebastian Rudd is the main character, a lawyer without an office. He has a son, Starcher, who was a bit of a surprise, a bodyguard Partner and a bitchy pit bull of an ex wife who relishes making his life difficult. Sebastian is definitely flawed, yet we are endeared to him. And I love his smart mouth. I enjoyed this one immensely, I would give this book a solid 4 1/2.
Date published: 2017-01-26
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Not my favourite John G. book This book was rather disappointing. The novel is sort of like mini stories in the larger context of the novel. The main character is not likeable and I found the character resembled the character in "The Lincoln Lawyer" somewhat. If you want a good book that has a lasting impact (I still think about the book four years later), read "The Confession" by John Grisham.
Date published: 2017-01-25
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Easy Read Rogue Lawyer is easily one of Grisham's best. Easy to read and couldn't put it down. Criminal defence lawyers are fascinating characters and made me think about this book even when not reading. I highly recommend to Grisham fans!
Date published: 2017-01-22
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Reading It Now Just reading this one now, kind of slow start compared to some of his other novels. Hoping for the usual Grisham magic in this book!
Date published: 2017-01-14
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Enjoyable It's been A while since I've read Grisham. A good easy read.
Date published: 2017-01-11
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Different than his others This one got off to a bit of a slow start, seeming more like a collection of short stories, though they did weave together somewhat in the end. Good, but not what I had expected
Date published: 2016-12-29
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Decent but kind of boring Compared to Other books written by John Grisham this one I had to push myself to read. It was a bit boring and the main character was hard to get along with and picture.
Date published: 2016-11-06
Rated 3 out of 5 by from 'Rogue Lawyer' is an embelished take onMichael Conally's 'Lincoln LawyerM series. John Grisham's take on Michael Connelly's 'Lincoln Lawyer series' practically copied verbatim plot for plot, albeit edited to avoid plagiarism.. The only difference is the van and its driver despite the fact that the driver is permanent. The Lincoln Lawyer drivers are there because the are working to pay Mike Haller for their successful defenses.
Date published: 2016-10-03

Read from the Book

1.       My name is Sebastian Rudd, and though I am a well‑known street lawyer, you will not see my name on billboards, on bus benches, or screaming at you from the yellow pages. I don’t pay to be seen on television, though I am often there. My name is not listed in any phone book. I do not maintain a traditional office. I carry a gun, legally, because my name and face tend to attract attention from the type of people who also carry guns and don’t mind using them. I live alone, usually sleep alone, and do not possess the patience and understanding necessary to maintain friendships. The law is my life, always consuming and occasionally fulfilling. I wouldn’t call it a “jealous mistress” as some forgotten person once so famously did. It’s more like an overbearing wife who controls the checkbook. There’s no way out.     These nights I find myself sleeping in cheap motel rooms that change each week. I’m not trying to save money; rather, I’m just trying to stay alive. There are plenty of people who’d like to kill me right now,  and a few of them have been quite vocal. They don’t tell you in law school that one day you may find yourself defending a person charged with a crime so heinous that otherwise peaceful citizens feel driven to take up arms and threaten to kill the accused, his lawyer, and even the judge.     But I’ve been threatened before. It’s part of being a rogue lawyer, a subspecialty of the profession that I more or less fell into ten years ago. When I finished law school, jobs were scarce. I reluctantly took a part‑time position in the City’s public defender’s office. From there I landed in a small, unprofitable firm that handled only criminal defense. After a few years, that firm blew up and I was on my own, out on the street with plenty of others, scrambling to make a buck.      One case put me on the map. I can’t say it made me famous because, seriously, how can you say a lawyer is famous in a city of a million people? Plenty of local hacks think they’re famous. They smile from billboards as they beg for your bankruptcy and swagger in television ads as they seem deeply concerned about your personal injuries, but they’re forced to pay for their own publicity. Not me.      The cheap motels change each week. I’m in the middle of a trial in a dismal, backwater, redneck town called Milo, two hours from where I live in the City. I am defending a brain‑damaged eighteen‑year‑old dropout who’s  charged with killing two little girls in one of the most evil crimes I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen plenty. My clients are almost always guilty, so I don’t waste a lot of time wringing my hands about whether they get what they deserve. In this case, though, Gardy is not guilty, not that it matters. It does not. What’s important in Milo these days is that Gardy gets convicted and sentenced to death and executed as soon as possible so that the town can feel better about itself and move on. Move on to where, exactly? Hell if I know, nor do I care. This place has been moving backward for fifty years, and one lousy verdict will not change its course. I’ve read and heard it said that Milo needs “closure,” whatever that means. You’d have to be an idiot to believe this town will somehow grow and prosper and become more tolerant as soon as Gardy gets the needle.      My job is layered and complicated, and at the same time it’s quite simple. I’m being paid by the State to provide a first‑class defense to a defendant charged with capital murder, and this requires me to fight and claw and raise hell in a courtroom where no one is listening. Gardy was essentially convicted the day he was arrested, and his trial is only a formality. The dumb and desperate cops trumped up the charges and fabricated the evidence. The prosecutor knows this but has no spine and is up for reelection next year. The judge is asleep. The jurors are basically nice, simple people, wide‑eyed at the process and ever so anxious to believe the lies their proud authorities are producing on the witness stand.      Milo has its share of cheap motels but I can’t stay there. I would be lynched or flayed or burned at the stake, or if I’m lucky a sniper would hit me between the eyes and it would be over in a flash. The state police are providing protection during the trial, but I get the clear impression these guys are just not into it. They view me the same way most people do. I’m a long‑haired roguish zealot sick enough to fight for the rights of child killers and the like.      My current motel is a Hampton Inn located twenty‑five minutes from Milo. It costs $60 a night and the State will reimburse me. Next door is Partner, a hulking, heavily armed guy who wears black suits and takes me everywhere. Partner is my driver, bodyguard, confidant, paralegal, caddie, and only friend. I earned his loyalty when a jury found him not guilty of killing an undercover narcotics officer. We walked out of the courtroom arm in arm and have been inseparable ever since. On at least two occasions, off‑duty cops have tried to kill him. On one occasion, they came after me.      We’re still standing. Or perhaps I should say we’re still ducking.       2.        At 8:00 a.m. Partner knocks on my door. It’s time to go. We say our good mornings and climb into my vehicle, which is a large black Ford cargo van, heavily customized for my needs. Since it doubles  as an office,  the rear seats have been rearranged around a small table that folds into a wall. There is a sofa where I often spend the night. All windows are shaded and bulletproof. It has a television, stereo system, Internet, refrigerator, bar, a couple of guns, and a change of clothes. I sit in the front with Partner and we unwrap fast‑food sausage biscuits as we leave the parking lot. An unmarked state police car moves in front of us for the escort to Milo. There is another one behind us. The last death threat was two days ago and came by e‑mail.      Partner does not speak unless spoken to. I didn’t make this rule but I adore it. He is not the least bit bothered by long gaps in the conversation, nor am I. After years of saying next to nothing, we have learned to communicate with nods and winks and silence. Halfway to Milo I open a file and start taking notes.      The double murder was so gruesome no local lawyer would touch it. Then Gardy was arrested, and one look at Gardy and you know he’s guilty. Long hair dyed jet‑black, an astonishing collection of piercings above the neck and tattoos below, matching steel earrings, cold pale eyes, and a smirk that says, “Okay, I did it, now what?” In its very first story, the Milo newspaper described him as “a member of a satanic cult who has a record of molesting children.”      How’s that for honest and unbiased reporting? He was never a member of a satanic cult and the child molestation thing is not what it seems.  But from that moment Gardy was guilty, and I still marvel at the fact that we’ve made it this far. They wanted to string him up months ago.      Needless to say, every lawyer in Milo locked his door and unplugged her phone. There is no public defender system in the town—it’s too small—and the indigent cases are doled out by the judge. There  is  an unwritten  rule that the  younger lawyers in town take these low‑paying cases because (1) someone has to and (2) the older lawyers did so when they were younger. But no one would agree to defend Gardy, and, to be honest, I can’t really blame them. It’s their town and their lives, and to rub shoulders with such a twisted murderer could do real damage to a career.      As a society, we adhere to the belief in a fair trial for a person accused of a serious crime, but some of us struggle when it comes to the business of providing a competent lawyer to guarantee said fair trial. Lawyers like me live with the question “But how do you represent such scum? ”      I offer a quick “Someone has to” as I walk away.      Do we really want fair trials? No, we do not. We want justice, and quickly. And justice is whatever we deem it to be on a case‑by‑case basis.      It’s just as well that we don’t believe in fair trials because we damned sure don’t have them. The presumption of innocence is now the presumption of guilt. The burden of proof is a travesty because the proof is often lies. Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt means if he probably did it, then let’s get him off the streets.      At any rate, the lawyers ran for the hills and Gardy had no one. It’s a commentary, sad or otherwise, on my reputation that I soon got the phone call. In this end of the state, it is now well known in legal circles that if you can’t find anybody else, call Sebastian Rudd. He’ll defend anybody!      When Gardy was arrested, a mob showed up outside the jail and screamed for justice. When the police perp‑walked him to a van for the ride to the courthouse, the mob cursed him and threw tomatoes and rocks. This was thoroughly reported by the local newspaper and even made the City’s evening news (there is no network station based in Milo, only a low‑end cable outfit). I howled for a change of venue, pleaded with the judge to move the trial at least a hundred miles away so we could hopefully find some jurors who hadn’t thrown stuff at the kid, or at the least cursed him over dinner. But we were denied. All of my pretrial motions were denied.      Again, the town wants justice. The town wants closure.      There is no mob to greet me and my van as we pull in to a short driveway behind the courthouse, but some of the usual actors are here. They huddle behind a police barricade not far away and hold their sad signs that say such clever things as “Hang the Baby Killer,” and “Satan Is Waiting,” and “Crud Rudd out of Milo!” There are about a dozen of these pathetic souls, just waiting to jeer at me and, more important, to show their hatred to Gardy, who will arrive at the same place in about five minutes. During the early days of the trial, this little crowd attracted cameras and a few of these people made it into the newspapers, along with their signs. This, of course, encouraged them and they’ve been here every morning since. Fat Susie holds the “Crud Rudd” sign and looks like she wants to shoot me. Bullet Bob claims to be a relative of one of the dead girls and was quoted as saying something to the effect that a trial was a waste of time.      He was right about that, I’m afraid.      When the van stops, Partner hurries around to my door, where he’s met by three young deputies about his size. I step out and am properly shielded, then I’m whisked into the rear door of the courthouse as Bullet Bob calls me a whore. Another safe entry. I’m not aware of any case in modern times in which a criminal defense attorney was gunned down while entering a courthouse in the middle of a trial. Nevertheless, I have resigned myself to the likelihood that I could well be the first.      We climb a narrow rear staircase that’s off‑limits to everyone else, and I’m led to a small windowless room where they once held prisoners waiting to see the judge. A few minutes later, Gardy arrives in one piece. Partner steps outside and closes the door.       “How ya doing?” I ask when we are alone.      He smiles and rubs his wrists, unshackled for a few hours. “Okay, I guess. Didn’t sleep much.” He  didn’t shower either because he’s afraid to shower. He tries it occasionally but they won’t turn on the hot water. So Gardy reeks of stale sweat and dirty sheets, and I’m thankful he’s far enough away from the jury. The black dye is slowly leaving his hair and each day it gets lighter, and his skin gets paler. He’s changing colors in front of the jury, another clear sign of his animalistic capabilities and satanic bent.      “What’s gonna happen today?” he asks, with an almost childlike curiosity. He has an IQ of 70, just barely enough to be prosecuted and put to death.      “More of the same, Gardy, I’m afraid. Just more of the same.”      “Can’t you make them stop lying? ”      “No, I cannot.”      The State has no physical evidence linking Gardy to the murders. Zero. So, instead of evaluating its lack of evidence and reconsidering its case, the State is doing what it often does. It’s plowing ahead with lies and fabricated testimony.      Gardy has spent two weeks in the courtroom, listening to the lies, closing his eyes while slowly shaking his head. He’s able to shake his head for hours at a time, and the jurors must think he’s crazy. I’ve told him to stop, to sit up, to take a pen and scribble something on a legal pad as if he has a brain and wants to fight back, to win. But he simply cannot do this and I cannot argue with my client in the courtroom.  I’ve also told him to cover his arms and neck to hide the tattoos, but he’s proud of them. I’ve told him to lose the piercings, but he insists on being who he is. The bright folks who run the Milo jail forbid piercings of all types, unless, of course, you’re Gardy and you’re headed back to the courtroom. In that case, stick ’em all over your face. Look as sick and creepy and satanic as possible, Gardy, so that your peers will have no trouble with your guilt.      On a nail is a hanger with the same white shirt and khaki pants he’s worn every day. I paid for this cheap ensemble. He slowly unzips the orange jail jumpsuit and steps out of it. He does not wear underwear, something I noticed the first day of the trial and have tried to ignore since. He slowly gets dressed. “So much lying,” he says.      And he’s right. The State has called nineteen witnesses so far and not a single  one resisted the temptation to embellish a bit, or to lie outright. The pathologist who did the autopsies at the state crime lab told the jury the two little victims had drowned, but he also added that “blunt force trauma” to their heads was a contributing factor. It’s a better story for the prosecution if the jury believes the girls were raped and beaten senseless before being tossed into the pond. There’s no physical proof they were in any way sexually molested, but that hasn’t stopped the prosecution from making this a part of its case. I haggled with the pathologist for three hours, but it’s tough arguing with an expert, even an incompetent one.      Since the State has no evidence, it is forced to manufacture some. The most outrageous testimony came from a jailhouse snitch they call Smut, an appropriate nickname. Smut is an accomplished courtroom liar who testifies all the time and will say whatever the prosecutors want him to say. In Gardy’s case, Smut was back in jail on a drug charge and looking at ten years in prison. The cops needed some testimony, and, not surprisingly, Smut was at their disposal. They fed him details of the crimes, then transferred Gardy from a regional jail to a county jail where Smut was locked up. Gardy had no idea why he was being transferred and had no clue that he was walking into a trap. (This happened before I got involved.) They threw Gardy into a small cell with Smut, who was anxious to talk and wanted to help in any way. He claimed to hate the cops  and know some good lawyers. He’d also read about the murders of the two girls and had a hunch he knew who really killed them. Since Gardy knew nothing about the murders, he had nothing to add to the conversation. Nonetheless, within twenty‑four hours Smut claimed he’d heard a full confession. The cops yanked him out of the cell and Gardy never saw him again, until trial. As a witness, Smut cleaned up nicely, wore a shirt and tie and short hair, and hid his tattoos from the jury. In amazing detail, he replayed Gardy’s account of how he stalked the two girls into the woods, knocked them off their bikes, gagged and bound them, then tortured, molested, and beat them before tossing them into the pond. In Smut’s  version, Gardy was high on drugs and had been listening to heavy metal.      It was quite a performance. I knew it was all a lie, as did Gardy and Smut, along with the cops and prosecutors, and I suspect the judge had his doubts too. Nevertheless, the jurors swallowed it in disgust and glared with hatred at my client, who absorbed it with his eyes closed and his head shaking, no, no, no. Smut’s testimony was so breathtakingly gruesome and rich with details that it was hard to believe, at times, that he was really fabricating it. No one can lie like that!      I hammered at Smut for eight full hours, one long exhausting day. The judge was cranky and the jurors were bleary‑eyed, but I could have kept going for a week. I asked Smut how many times he’d testified in criminal trials. He said maybe twice. I pulled out the records,  refreshed  his memory, and went through the nine other trials in which he’d performed the same miracle for our honest and fair‑minded prosecutors. With his muddled memory somewhat restored, I asked him how many times he’d had his sentence reduced by the prosecutors after lying for them in court. He said never, so I went through each of the nine cases again. I produced the paperwork. I made it perfectly clear to everyone, especially the jurors, that Smut was a lying, serial snitch who swapped bogus testimony for leniency.      I confess—I get angry in court, and this is often detrimental. I blew my cool with Smut and hammered him so relentlessly that some of the jurors became sympathetic. The judge finally told me to move on, but I didn’t. I hate liars, especially those who swear to tell the truth and then fabricate testimony to convict my client. I yelled at Smut and the judge yelled at me, and at times it seemed as though everyone was yelling. This did not help Gardy’s cause.      You would think the prosecutor might break up his parade of liars with a credible witness, but this would require some intelligence. His next witness was another inmate, another druggie who testified he was in the hallway near Gardy’s cell and heard him confess to Smut.      Lies on top of lies.      “Please make them stop,” Gardy says.      “I’m trying, Gardy. I’m doing the best I can. We need to go.”

Editorial Reviews

“Terrific . . . inventive . . . John Grisham still makes it look easy.”—Maureen Corrigan, The Washington Post   “Sebastian Rudd is . . . a kind of twenty-first-century Philip Marlowe . . . with a blunt, rude, gravelly poetic wiseguy voice.”—Benjamin Percy, The New York Times Book Review   “Deeply engaging and entertaining . . . [Grisham finds] intense drama in the little skirmishes that play out across our legal system every day.”—Charles Finch, USA Today   “Grisham has taken a step in an intriguing new direction.”—Janet Maslin, The New York Times