Role Motivation Theories: ROLE MOTIVATION THEORIES by John B. Miner

Role Motivation Theories: ROLE MOTIVATION THEORIES

byJohn B. MinerEditorJohn B. Miner

Paperback | November 16, 1994

not yet rated|write a review

Pricing and Purchase Info

$77.02 online 
$81.10
Earn 385 plum® points

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

Role Motivation Theoriesis concerned with four types of organisations and what makes them work. The four are not exhaustive of all possible organisational types but they do represent the major forms found in the world today. If we wish to understand organisational functioning in modern society then we need to have substantial insight into these four types of organisations.
Drawing upon many years of research, John B. Miner argues that the organisational effectiveness required to produce high levels of productivity results from achieving a state of integration between the type of organizatonal system and the kind of people who fill the key positions in the system.Role Motivation Theoresis the most comprehensive and up-to-date treatment of this work available.

Details & Specs

Title:Role Motivation Theories: ROLE MOTIVATION THEORIESFormat:PaperbackDimensions:370 pages, 9.02 × 5.98 × 1 inPublished:November 16, 1994Publisher:Taylor and Francis

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0415119944

ISBN - 13:9780415119948

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Role Motivation Theories: ROLE MOTIVATION THEORIES

Reviews

Extra Content

Editorial Reviews

." . . "Role Motivation Theories is a most impressive book. It is clearly written. The theoretical framework provides a model for future research into trait theories of leadership and could be used with advantage in the development of more valid and practical content theories of work motivation. The issue of cultural and individual differences is address with admirable, and rare, thoroughness and, throughout, Miner provides a very balanced account of his theories of merit and limitations."-"Journal of Management Studies