Seduction and Repetition in Ovid's Ars Amatoria 2 by Alison SharrockSeduction and Repetition in Ovid's Ars Amatoria 2 by Alison Sharrock

Seduction and Repetition in Ovid's Ars Amatoria 2

byAlison Sharrock

Hardcover | June 1, 1994

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 2,325 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


Ships within 1-3 weeks

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


The Ars Amatoria is a poem about sex and poetry, and poetry as sex. Witty and subversive, it is a poem of seduction about seduction: the seduction of the `implied' reader being initiated into the art of love, and ourselves, as we are seduced by the poet into the act of reading the poem. Thisbook offers a new and sophisticated critical assessment of the poem, based on the close analysis of certain passages, whilst at the same time being concerned with the reading of Ovidian poetry generally. Dr Sharrock's study is overtly theoretical, influenced in particular by deconstruction andreader-response theory, with an emphasis on intertextuality. In it she discusses a range of original and important issues: the traditions of didactic poetry and of elegy; the nature of the addressee in literature; the relationship between author and reader, speaker and addressee; poeticself-display; digression and relevence; programmatic theory and poetic value under the sign of Callimachus. This is an important and innovative work, which should be of interest not only to classicists but also to literary critics and theorists in English and other literatures.
Alison Sharrock is at University of Keele.
Title:Seduction and Repetition in Ovid's Ars Amatoria 2Format:HardcoverDimensions:334 pages, 8.5 × 5.43 × 0.98 inPublished:June 1, 1994Publisher:Oxford University Press

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:019814959X

ISBN - 13:9780198149590


Editorial Reviews

`S. has written a brave book, unconventional in manner and organization, unapologetically modern in critical approach ... there are moments of fine insight here, and every page bears evidence of impressive scholarship. This is the work of a superbly prepared young classicist alert to newerdevelopments in criticism; we will hear more from her.'D.M. Hooley, University of Missouri, Columbia, Classical Review, Vol. XLVI, No. 1, 1996