Significant Cases in Criminal Procedure

Paperback | January 30, 2013

byCraig Hemmens, Alan Thompson, Lisa S. Nored

not yet rated|write a review
Easily accessible to undergraduates, Significant Cases in Criminal Procedure, Second Edition, offers a clear, comprehensive introduction to criminal procedure. Rather than providing complete opinions, which may overwhelm students, the authors present case briefs, along with analyses,explanations, and short excerpts. In addition to the case summaries, the book includes lists of all of the cases it covers, both in alphabetical order and grouped by topic; a short introduction to each topic; and an index.CRIMINAL JUSTICE CASE BRIEFS SERIES:Significant Cases in Criminal Procedure, Second EditionCraig Hemmens, Alan Thompson, and Lisa S. Nored (978-0-19-995791-0)Significant Cases in Corrections, Second EditionCraig Hemmens, Barbara Belbot, and Katherine Bennett (978-0-19-994858-1)Significant Cases in Juvenile Justice, Second EditionCraig Hemmens, Benjamin Steiner, and David Mueller (978-0-19-995841-2)

Pricing and Purchase Info

$37.95

Ships within 1-3 weeks
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

Easily accessible to undergraduates, Significant Cases in Criminal Procedure, Second Edition, offers a clear, comprehensive introduction to criminal procedure. Rather than providing complete opinions, which may overwhelm students, the authors present case briefs, along with analyses,explanations, and short excerpts. In addition to the ...

Craig Hemmens is Professor and Department Head of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Missouri State University. Alan Thompson is Associate Professor of Criminal Justice at the University of Southern Mississippi. Lisa S. Nored is Associate Professor of Criminal Justice at the University of Southern Mississippi.

other books by Craig Hemmens

Criminal Procedure and the Supreme Court: A Guide to the Major Decisions on Search and Seizure…
Criminal Procedure and the Supreme Court: A Guide to th...

Kobo ebook|Sep 15 2010

$61.59 online$79.99list price(save 23%)
Corrections: A Text/Reader
Corrections: A Text/Reader

Kobo ebook|Mar 20 2012

$93.18

see all books by Craig Hemmens
Format:PaperbackDimensions:240 pages, 10 × 8 × 0.68 inPublished:January 30, 2013Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0199957916

ISBN - 13:9780199957910

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of Significant Cases in Criminal Procedure

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

1. The Exclusionary RuleWeeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914)Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952)Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963)Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984)United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984)Massachusetts v. Sheppard, 468 U.S. 981 (1984)Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990)Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995)Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009)Davis v. United States, --- U.S. --- (2011)2. What Constitutes Probable Cause?Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 (1964)Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307 (1959)Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983)Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005)3. Stop and FriskTerry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972)United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221 (1985)United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1 (1989)Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325 (1990)Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993)Florida v. J. L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000)Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000)Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 (2009)4. When Has A Seizure Occurred?Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966)Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567 (1988)Brower v. County of Inyo, 489 U.S. 593 (1989)California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991)Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (1991)Bond v. United States, 529 U.S. 334 (2000)Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)Illinois v. McArthur, 531 U.S. 326 (2001)Hiibel v. Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004)Muehler v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (2005)Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007)5. ArrestUnited States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976)Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200 (1979)Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980)Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740 (1984)United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992)Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001)6. Standards for the Use of ForceTennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 396 (1989)Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007)7. Searches With WarrantsCoolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971)Zurcher v. Stanford Daily, 436 U.S. 547 (1978)Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 (1978)Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204 (1981)Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981)Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1987)California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988)Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83 (1998)Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004)U.S. v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012)8. The Knock and Announce RuleWilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 (1995)Richards v. Wisconsin, 520 U.S. 385 (1997)United States v. Banks, 540 U.S. 31 (2003)Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006)9. Search Incident to ArrestWarden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967)Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969)Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1970)United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973)United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 (1974)Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325 (1990)Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164 (2006)Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009)10. Consent SearchesStoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483 (1964)Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968)Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973)Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 (1983)Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990)Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248 (1991)United States v. Drayton et al., 536 U.S. 194 (2002)Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006)11. Plain View SearchesTexas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 (1983)Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987)Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990)12. Open Fields SearchesOliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984)California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986)United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (1987)13. Vehicle SearchesCarroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925)Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970)Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979)New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981)United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982)Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983)California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (1985)Florida v. Wells, 495 U.S. 1 (1990)California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991)Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996)Pennsylvania v. Labron, 518 U.S. 938 (1996)Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996)Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997)Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (1998)Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295 (1999)Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003)Illinois v. Lidster, 540 U.S. 419 (2004)14. Regulatory SearchesSouth Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 (1976)Illinois v. Lafayette, 462 U.S. 640 (1983)Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523 (1967)New York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691 (1987)United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976)Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000)New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985)O'Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987)Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995)Ferguson v. Charleston, 523 U.S. 67 (2001)Board of Education of Independent School District v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822 (2002)Griffin v. Wisconsin, 483 U.S. 868 (1987)Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (2006)United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001)Ontario v. Quon, 560 U.S. --- (2010)Kentucky v. King, --- U.S. --- (2011)15. Electronic SurveillanceOlmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41 (1967)Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705 (1984)United States v. Jones, --- U.S. --- (2012)16. Pretrial Identification ProceduresUnited States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967)Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972)Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 (1977)United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 (1980)Perry v. New Hampshire, --- U.S. --- (2012)17. Right to CounselPowell et al. v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932)Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964)Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964)United States v. Henry, 447 U.S. 264 (1980)Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008)Kansas v. Ventris, 556 U.S. --- (2009)Montejo v. Louisiana, 556 U.S. 778 (2009)18. The Development and Scope of the Miranda WarningsBrown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936)Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981)South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 (1983)Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984)New York v. Quarles, 467 U.S. 649 (1984)Oregon v. Elstad, 70 U.S. 298 (1985)Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986)Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564 (1987)Patterson v. Illinois, 487 U.S. 285 (1988)Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 (1988)Duckworth v. Eagan, 492 U.S. 195 (1989)Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146 (1990)Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582 (1990)Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279 (1991)McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171 (1991)Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994)Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 (2004)U.S. v. Patane, 542 U.S. 360 (2004)Florida v. Powell, 559 U.S. --- (2010)Maryland v. Shatzer, 559 U.S. --- (2010)Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. --- (2010)J.D.B. v. North Carolina, 564 U.S. --- (2011)19. What Constitutes Interrogation?Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977)Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 (1980)Arizona v. Mauro, 481 U.S. 520 (1987)20. Civil LiabilityMonroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961)Monell v. Department of Social Services of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978)Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980)Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986)City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (1989)Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 (1989)Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 (1997)McMillian v. Monroe County, 520 U.S. 781 (1997)County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998)Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001)Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005)Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. --- (2010)