Textual and Literary Criticism by Fredson BowersTextual and Literary Criticism by Fredson Bowers

Textual and Literary Criticism

byFredson Bowers

Paperback

Pricing and Purchase Info

$42.26 online 
$46.95 list price save 9%
Earn 211 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store

Quantity:

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

The literary critic tends to think that the textual scholar or bibliographer, happily occupied in his travel drudgery, has not much to say that he would care to hear, so there is a gulf between them. Professor Bowers advances to the edge of this gulf and says several forceful things across it; they turn out to be important and interesting, though occasionally scathing. The first chapter reminds us that the literary critic can only criticise with confidence when the textual critic has established what the author wrote; Professor Bowers indicates how very much has yet to be done. The second chapter takes a particular case, Walt Whitman's copy' for the 1860 edition of Leaves of Grass, and shows how the bibliographer can, by ingenious but rigorous deduction, give an insight into the growth of an author's conception of the nature and aim of his work. The other two lectures, on Shakespeare and other early dramatic texts, will show non-specialists the striking advances in editorial technique, and the growth of standards of scholarship in these studies.
Title:Textual and Literary CriticismFormat:PaperbackDimensions:200 pages, 7.99 × 5 × 0.47 inPublisher:Cambridge University Press

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0521094070

ISBN - 13:9780521094078

Look for similar items by category:

Reviews

Table of Contents

Preface; 1. Textual criticism and the literary critic; 2. The Walt Whitman manuscripts of Leaves of Grass (1860); 3. The new textual criticism of Shakespeare; 4. Principle and practice in the editing of early dramatic texts; Notes.

Editorial Reviews

Review of the hardback: 'Should be required reading for all literary critics.' New Statesman