The Boundary Stones of Thought: An Essay in the Philosophy of Logic by Ian RumfittThe Boundary Stones of Thought: An Essay in the Philosophy of Logic by Ian Rumfitt

The Boundary Stones of Thought: An Essay in the Philosophy of Logic

byIan Rumfitt

Paperback | November 11, 2017

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 138 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


Ships within 1-3 weeks

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


The Boundary Stones of Thought seeks to defend classical logic from a number of attacks of a broadly anti-realist character. Ian Rumfitt is sympathetic to many of the premisses underlying these attacks. Indeed, he regards some of them as effective challenges to certain principles of classicalsemantics, notably the Principle of Bivalence. He argues, though, that they are ineffective against classical logic itself. The book starts by considering the general problem of how conflicts over logical laws may be rationally discussed and adjudicated. This leads to a consideration of the nature of logic: Rumfitt identifies the particular features that mark out logical consequence from other consequence relations, andhe advances a new argument for the ancient thesis that there is a modal element in the notion of logical consequence. He develops a theory of that modal element in terms of perhaps incomplete possibilities, rather than fully determinate possible worlds. Some prima facie powerful arguments againstthe validity of certain classical logical laws are then analysed in the light of this account of logic. Throughout, care is taken to separate lines of anti-classical argument that, although distinct, are often run together or confused. The analysis yields, as by-products, semantic theories for a number of problematical areas of discourse. These areas include our talk about sub-atomic particles, about the infinite, about infinitesimals, about sets, and vague discourse. Rumfitt concludes by defending his stance of acceptingclassical logic while rejecting Bivalence, against Aristotle's argument that a classical logician is committed to Bivalence. The ultimate aim is to liberate classical logic from the dead hand of classical semantics.
Ian Rumfitt studied philosophy at Balliol College, Oxford and at Princeton University. He has taught the subject at Keele University, the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, University College, Oxford (where he was a Tutorial Fellow for seven years), and at Birkbeck College, London (where he was Professor of Philosophy from 2005 until...
Title:The Boundary Stones of Thought: An Essay in the Philosophy of LogicFormat:PaperbackDimensions:368 pages, 9.21 × 6.14 × 0 inPublished:November 11, 2017Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0198801351

ISBN - 13:9780198801351

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

1. IntroductionPART ONE: THE NATURE OF LOGIC2. Logical laws3. Logical necessityPART TWO: FIVE ATTACKS ON CLASSICAL LOGIC4. The argument of Dummett's 'Truth'5. The verificationist attack on classical logic6. Possibilities7. Challenges from the infinite and from the infinitesimal8. The challenge from vagueness9. On the use of classical logic in set theory10. ConclusionBibliographyIndex