The Early History of Greed: The Sin of Avarice in Early Medieval Thought and Literature by Richard NewhauserThe Early History of Greed: The Sin of Avarice in Early Medieval Thought and Literature by Richard Newhauser

The Early History of Greed: The Sin of Avarice in Early Medieval Thought and Literature

byRichard NewhauserEditorAlastair Minnis, Patrick Boyde

Paperback | June 1, 2006

Pricing and Purchase Info

$63.36

Earn 317 plum® points

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

In this full-length study of the early history of greed Richard Newhauser challenges the traditional view that avarice only became a dominant sin with the rise of a money economy. He shows that avaritia, the sin of greed for possessions, was dominant in a wide range of theological and literary texts from the first century CE, and that by the early Middle Ages avarice headed the list of vices for authors aiming to convert others from pagan materialism to Christian spirituality.
Title:The Early History of Greed: The Sin of Avarice in Early Medieval Thought and LiteratureFormat:PaperbackDimensions:264 pages, 8.98 × 5.98 × 0.59 inPublished:June 1, 2006Publisher:Cambridge University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0521026482

ISBN - 13:9780521026482

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of The Early History of Greed: The Sin of Avarice in Early Medieval Thought and Literature

Reviews

Table of Contents

List of abbreviations; Preface; 1. Alms and ascetes, round stones and masons: avarice in the early church; 2. Ascetic transformations I: monks and the laity in eastern Christendom; 3. Ascetic transformations II: soaring eagles or safety in the herd - from anchoritic to cenobitic monasticism; 4. Ascetic transformations III: the Latin west in the fourth and fifth centuries; 5. Secularizing avarice and cupidity; Epilogue: Future perspectives; Appendix; Notes; Bibliography; Indexes.

Editorial Reviews

"Engaging [...] Newhauser shows us how the history of ideas should be done." The Medieval Review