The Ethics of Intensity in American Fiction by Anthony Channell HilferThe Ethics of Intensity in American Fiction by Anthony Channell Hilfer

The Ethics of Intensity in American Fiction

byAnthony Channell Hilfer

Paperback | November 1, 2011

Pricing and Purchase Info

$34.53

Earn 173 plum® points

In stock online

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores

about

Drawing upon the philosophical theories of William James, Dewey, and Mead and focusing upon major works by Whitman, Stein, Howells, Dreiser, and Henry James, Anthony Hilfer explores how these authors have structured their characters' consciousness, their purpose in doing so, and how this presentation controls the reader's moral response.
Hilfer contends that there was a significant change in the mode of character presentation in American literature of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The self defined in terms of a Victorian ethic and judged adversely for its departures from that code shifted to the self defined in terms of emotional intensity and judged adversely for its failures of nerve. In the first mode, characters are almost always wrong to yield to desire; in the second, characters are frequently wrong not to and, in fact, are seen less as the sum of their ethical choices than as the process of their longings.

His conclusion: modern fiction is as overbalanced toward pathos as Victorian fiction was toward ethos. but the continued dialectic between the two is a tension that ought not be resolved.

Anthony Channell Hilfer (1936-2008) was professor of English at the University of Texas at Austin.
Title:The Ethics of Intensity in American FictionFormat:PaperbackDimensions:224 pages, 9 × 6 × 0.68 inPublished:November 1, 2011Publisher:University Of Texas PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0292741138

ISBN - 13:9780292741133

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of The Ethics of Intensity in American Fiction

Reviews

Table of Contents

  • Acknowledgments
  • Preface
  • Introduction
    • 1. Ethos vs. Pathos
    • 2. Pragmatic Philosophers and Realistic Novelists
  • 1. The Ethical Imperative: “Self, Self, Self” in Victorian Fiction
    • 1. “Self”
    • 2. Religious Humanism
    • 3. Renunciation
    • 4. The Psychology of “Self”
    • 5. The Analysis of “Self”: Romola
    • 6. The Reaction from Analysis: The Cat on the Vivisection Table
  • 2. Whitman’s Body: Kinesthetic Imagery and Sexual Pathos in “Song of Myself”
    • 1. Dissociations
    • 2. Reconstitutions
  • 3. A Modern Instance: Pathos Subordinated to Ethos
    • 1. Whitman and Pathos, Eliot and Ethos
    • 2. Physical Signs as Ethical Signs
    • 3. Community Ethos: Ideal Motivations
    • 4. Tropisms: Real Motivations
    • 5. Bartley’s Reveries: The Ethical Structuring of Consciousness
    • 6. Conscience as Inner Debate
    • 7. Negative Essence and False Consciousness
    • 8. Marital Realpolitik and the Stages of Degeneration
    • 9. Chance, Timing, Rhythm
    • 10. Punitive Tragedy
  • 4. Henry James: An Ethics of Intensity
    • I. “The Beast in the Jungle”
      • 1. “A Great Negative Adventure”: Irony and Sympathy
      • 2. Marcher as Solipsist: The Ethics of Intensity
    • II. The Wings of the Dove
      • 1. Self and Other
      • 2. Social Construction: Pseudo-Selves
      • 3. Social Construction: The “Original Fun of Mistakes”
      • 4. Performance
      • 5. The Biological Imperative
      • 6. The Construction of a Personage
      • 7. The Larger Self
  • 5. Dreiser: Pathos as Ethos
    • 1. Dreiser’s Barbaric Naturalism: The Ethical Attack
    • 2. Pathos as Ethos
    • 3. Dreiser’s Platonism: “When I Read Spencer I Could Only Sigh”
    • 4. Carrie’s Face: The Natural Expression of Longing
    • 5. Dreiser and Howells: Two Modes of Realism
    • 6. An American Tragedy: Sympathy and Discomfort
  • 6. Stein’s “Melanctha”: An Education in Pathos
    • 1. Stein as Radical Empiricist
    • 2. Understanding Wandering
    • 3. Real Experience: “The Squeeze of This World’s Life”
    • 4. Melanctha and Jeff: Pathos vs. Ethos
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Index