The Ethics of Plea Bargaining by Richard L. LippkeThe Ethics of Plea Bargaining by Richard L. Lippke

The Ethics of Plea Bargaining

byRichard L. Lippke

Hardcover | November 7, 2011

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 630 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store


Ships within 1-3 weeks

Ships free on orders over $25

Not available in stores


The practice of plea bargaining plays a hugely significant role in the adjudication of criminal charges and has provoked intense debate about its legitimacy. This book offers the first full-length philosophical analysis of the ethics of plea bargaining. It develops a sustained argument forrestrained forms of the practice and against the free-wheeling versions that predominate in the United States.In countries that have endorsed plea bargains, such as the United States, upwards of ninety percent of criminal defendants plead guilty rather than go to trial. Yet trials, which grant a presumption of innocence to defendants and place a substantial burden of proof on the state to establish guilt,are widely regarded as the most appropriate mechanisms for fairly and accurately assigning criminal sanctions. How is it that many countries have abandoned the formal rules and rigorous standards of public trials in favor of informal and veiled negotiations between state officials and criminaldefendants concerning the punishment to which the latter will be subjected? More importantly, how persuasive are the myriad justifications that have been provided for plea bargaining? These are the questions addressed in this book.Examining the legal processes by which individuals are moved through the criminal justice system, the fairness of those processes, and the ways in which they reproduce social inequality, this book offers an ethical argument for restrained forms of plea bargaining. It also provides a comparisonbetween the different plea bargaining regimes that exist within the US, where it is well-established, England and Wales, where the practice is coming under considerable critique, and the European Union, where debate continues on whether it coheres with inquisitorial legal regimes. It suggests thatrewards for admitting guilt are distinguished from penalties for exercising the right to trial, and argues for modest, fixed sentence reductions for defendants who admit their guilt. These suggestions for reform include discouraging the current practice of deliberate over-charging by prosecutors andcharge bargaining, and require judges to scrutinize more closely the evidence against those accused of crimes before any guilty pleas are entered by them. Arguing that the negotiation of charges and sentences should remain the exception, not the rule, it nevertheless puts forward a normative defensefor the reform and retention of the plea bargaining system.
Richard L. Lippke is a Senior Scholar in the Department of Criminal Justice at Indiana University. In addition to his current position, he has held teaching positions at James Madison University and DePauw University, and has been a visiting fellow at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at Australian National Universit...
Title:The Ethics of Plea BargainingFormat:HardcoverDimensions:272 pages, 9.21 × 6.14 × 0 inPublished:November 7, 2011Publisher:Oxford University PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0199641463

ISBN - 13:9780199641468

Look for similar items by category:


Table of Contents

Introduction1. Waiver Rewards and Trial Penalties2. Against Trial Penalties3. Waiver Rewards and Deserved Punishment4. Remorse and Waiver Rewards5. Waiver Rewards and the Reduction of Crime6. Rewarding Cooperation7. Plea Bargains as Contracts8. Principled Criminal Prosecution and Half-Loaves9. Plea Bargaining and Getting at the TruthEpilogue