The Fallacy Of Campaign Finance Reform

Hardcover | October 1, 2006

byJohn Samples

not yet rated|write a review

At first glance, campaign finance reform looks like a good idea. McCain-Feingold, for instance, regulates campaigns by prohibiting national political parties from accepting soft money contributions from corporations, labor unions, and wealthy individuals. But are such measures, or any of the numerous and similarly restrictive proposals that have circulated through Washington in recent years, really good for our democracy? 

John Samples says no, and here he takes a penetrating look into the premises and consequences of the long crusade against big money in politics. How many Americans, he asks, know that there is little to no evidence that campaign contributions really influence members of Congress? Or that so-called negative political advertising actually improves the democratic process by increasing voter turnout and knowledge? Or that limits on campaign contributions make it harder to run for office, thereby protecting incumbent representatives from losing their seats of power? 

Posing tough questions such as these, Samples uncovers numerous fallacies beneath proposals for campaign finance reform. He argues that our most common concerns about money in politics are misplaced because the ideals implicit in our notion of corruption are incoherent or indefensible. The chance to regulate money in politics allows representatives to serve their own interests at a cost to their constituents. And, ironically, this long crusade against the corruption caused by campaign contributions allows public officials to reduce their vulnerability by suppressing electoral competition.  

Defying long-held ssumptions and conventional political wisdom, The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform is a provocative and decidedly nonpartisan work that will be essential for anyone concerned about the future of American government. 

Pricing and Purchase Info

$37.23 online
$37.95 list price
In stock online
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

At first glance, campaign finance reform looks like a good idea. McCain-Feingold, for instance, regulates campaigns by prohibiting national political parties from accepting soft money contributions from corporations, labor unions, and wealthy individuals. But are such measures, or any of the numerous and similarly restrictive proposals...

John Samples directs the Cato Institute’s Center for Representative Government and teaches in the government program at the Johns Hopkins University in Washington, D.C.

other books by John Samples

The Glaucoma Book: A Practical, Evidence-Based Approach to Patient Care
The Glaucoma Book: A Practical, Evidence-Based Approach...

Kobo ebook|Jun 10 2010

$224.19 online$291.11list price(save 22%)
10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10
10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10

Kobo ebook|Nov 23 2012

$25.29 online$32.80list price(save 22%)
Clinical Glaucoma Care: The Essentials
Clinical Glaucoma Care: The Essentials

Kobo ebook|Nov 27 2013

$86.79 online$112.62list price(save 22%)
see all books by John Samples
Format:HardcoverDimensions:328 pages, 9 × 6 × 1.1 inPublished:October 1, 2006Publisher:University Of Chicago PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0226734501

ISBN - 13:9780226734507

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of The Fallacy Of Campaign Finance Reform

Reviews

Extra Content

Table of Contents

Preface
Introduction: Money and Speech
Part I. The Conflict of Ideals
1. The Madisonian Vision of Politics
2. The Progressive Vision of Politics
Part II. Four Illusions
3. The Corruption of Representation
4. Political Culture
5. Equality
6. Electoral Competition
Part III. Realities
7. The Origins of Modern Campaign Finance Law
8. McCain-Feingold and the Market for Incumbent Protection
9. A Liberalizing Agenda
Notes
Index

Editorial Reviews

"A wonderful volume that debunks pretty much everything that one hears from modern 'good government goo-goos.' From his astute analysis of the seemingly eternal Progressive Movement to his citing of study after study that demonstrate that legal campaign contributions do not 'corrupt' the political process."