The Grasping Hand: Kelo V. City Of New London And The Limits Of Eminent Domain

Paperback | November 29, 2016

byIlya Somin

not yet rated|write a review
In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that the city of New London, Connecticut, could condemn fifteen residential properties in order to transfer them to a new private owner. Although the Fifth Amendment only permits the taking of private property for “public use,” the Court ruled that the transfer of condemned land to private parties for “economic development” is permitted by the Constitution—even if the government cannot prove that the expected development will ever actually happen. The Court’s decision in Kelo v. City of New London empowered the grasping hand of the state at the expense of the invisible hand of the market.
           
In this detailed study of one of the most controversial Supreme Court cases in modern times, Ilya Somin argues that Kelo was a grave error. Economic development and “blight” condemnations are unconstitutional under both originalist and most “living constitution” theories of legal interpretation. They also victimize the poor and the politically weak for the benefit of powerful interest groups and often destroy more economic value than they create. Kelo itself exemplifies these patterns. The residents targeted for condemnation lacked the influence needed to combat the formidable government and corporate interests arrayed against them.  Moreover, the city’s poorly conceived development plan ultimately failed: the condemned land lies empty to this day, occupied only by feral cats. The Supreme Court’s unpopular ruling triggered an unprecedented political reaction, with forty-five states passing new laws intended to limit the use of eminent domain. But many of the new laws impose few or no genuine constraints on takings. The Kelo backlash led to significant progress, but not nearly as much as it may have seemed.

Despite its outcome, the closely divided 5-4 ruling shattered what many believed to be a consensus that virtually any condemnation qualifies as a public use under the Fifth Amendment. It also showed that there is widespread public opposition to eminent domain abuse. With controversy over takings sure to continue, The Grasping Hand offers the first book-length analysis of Kelo by a legal scholar, alongside a broader history of the dispute over public use and eminent domain and an evaluation of options for reform.
 

Pricing and Purchase Info

$28.25

In stock online
Ships free on orders over $25

From the Publisher

In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that the city of New London, Connecticut, could condemn fifteen residential properties in order to transfer them to a new private owner. Although the Fifth Amendment only permits the taking of private property for “public use,” the Court ruled that the transfer of condemned land to private parties for “...

Ilya Somin is professor of law at the George Mason University School of Law. He is the author of Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is Smarter and writes regularly for the popular Volokh Conspiracy blog.  

other books by Ilya Somin

Democracy And Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter, Second Edition
Democracy And Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Governme...

Paperback|Jun 15 2016

$36.44 online$36.50list price
Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter
Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Governme...

Kobo ebook|Oct 2 2013

$28.29 online$36.68list price(save 22%)
Federal Britain: The Case for Decentralisation: The Case for Decentralisation
Federal Britain: The Case for Decentralisation: The Cas...

Kobo ebook|Nov 6 2015

$6.59 online$8.56list price(save 23%)
see all books by Ilya Somin
Format:PaperbackDimensions:384 pages, 9 × 6 × 1.1 inPublished:November 29, 2016Publisher:University Of Chicago PressLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:022642216X

ISBN - 13:9780226422169

Look for similar items by category:

Customer Reviews of The Grasping Hand: Kelo V. City Of New London And The Limits Of Eminent Domain

Reviews

Extra Content

Editorial Reviews

“For much of America’s past, the rhetoric of property rights was the dominant trope for advocates of democratic and egalitarian economic policies. The anti-Kelo backlash provides a brief glimpse of what a revived, populist property rights rhetoric might look like. Building on that moment would involve some uncomfortable adjustments by both libertarians and liberals. Somin’s intriguing book illustrates both the promise and the challenges of that effort.”