The Journal Of Philology Volume 15 by William George ClarkThe Journal Of Philology Volume 15 by William George Clark

The Journal Of Philology Volume 15

byWilliam George Clark

Paperback | February 12, 2012

Pricing and Purchase Info


Earn 140 plum® points

Prices and offers may vary in store

Out of stock online

Not available in stores


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1886 Excerpt: ... DIERECTUS. Professor Arthur Palmer's careful discussion of this word in the last number of the Journal of Philology calls for some reply on my part. My belief, expressed some time ago in this Journal and more recently in the Academy (May 18, 1885) is that dierectus is a vox nihili, and represents, as the case may be, either directus cr derectus. Thus i directum would mean 'Go and be crucified ', i derectum ' Go downwards, go to hell'. The difficulty which I feel with regard to dierectus (whether scanned dl-or d%-) is that, so far as I know, there is no analogy for such a form in Latin. The adverb dis before a vowel becomes dir-(dir-imo, dir-ibeo): before a semivowel, liquid, sibilant, or spirant, it may become di-(dis-moveo di-moveo, dis-rumpo di-rumpo, disrectus di-rectus, di-(f)fringo, dl-vello, di-scribo, &c.). Professor Palmer, scanning dl-e-rectus, supposes 'that the word is from dis and erigo, the di lengthened to compensate for the loss of s or t into which s would have passed without compensation had there not been another r in the word.' On this analogy one would have expected per-erro to become pe-erro. The suggestion is ingenious enough: but can it be supported by any known process of Latin phonetics? Holding the existence of dierectus, as a Latin word, impossible, though I can imagine that it might possibly represent some bastard issue of Biapprjyvvfii, I am bound to attempt some explanation of a form which often appears in the manuscripts of Plautus, and once in those of Paulus and Nonius. I admit at once that in saying 'in several passages the word dierectus is supported by respectable MS. authority/ I understated Mr Palmer's case. I should have said "in many passages." But is the manuscript evidence, as Mr Palmer puts it, 'simply overwhelmin...
Title:The Journal Of Philology Volume 15Format:PaperbackDimensions:96 pages, 9.69 × 7.44 × 0.2 inPublished:February 12, 2012Publisher:General Books LLCLanguage:English

The following ISBNs are associated with this title:

ISBN - 10:0217842062

ISBN - 13:9780217842068